ibis VS duckdb

ibis – portable Python dataframe library

The main benefit is that you get a Python (or R, Julia or Rust) interpreter. So you can evaluate code. A good example of the value of this is the Ibis docs which use Quarto: https://ibis-project.org/

Ive found polars quite intuitive, though for python, I lean more towards [ibis](https://ibis-project.org/). The interface is nearly identical, but ibis has the benefit if building sql queries before pulling any actual data (like dbplyr) — whereas polars requires the data to be in-memory (at least for rdb’s, though correct me if Im wrong)

this to me seems like a good argument for only using ibis, but Im happy to be convinced otherwise

Please add Ibis Birdbrain https://ibis-project.github.io/ibis-birdbrain/ to the list. Birdbrain is an AI-powered data bot, built on Ibis and Marvin, supporting more than 18 database backends.

See https://github.com/ibis-project/ibis and https://ibis-project.org for more details.

Ibis: The portable Python dataframe library

We have Ibis which helps you write generic analytics pipelines and it supports multiple backends and you can either run these pipeline on a query processing engine or a pyspark cluster or even on Pandas or Polars.

Ibis could also be a target. It compiles queries written in python to multiple dataframe libraries, and SQL targets.

https://ibis-project.org/

You might be interested in checking out Ibis (https://ibis-project.org/). It provides a dataframe-like API, abstracting over many common execution engines (duckdb, postgres, bigquery, spark, ...). Ibis wrapping duckdb has pretty much replaced pandas as my tool of choice for local data analysis. All the performance of duckdb with all the ergonomics of a dataframe API. (disclaimer: I contribute to Ibis for work).

I'm not sure if the fix is reassuring or not: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/pull/9411/files

Just had a look (https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/issues/9399). Yeah it's worrying that such a trivial query returned incorrect results - but credit to the Devs for getting it fixed quickly.

To my knowledge the only databases that can be described as "military-grade" in terms of testing are SQLite and Postgres.

It's an interesting question!

The problem is that the data is spread everywhere - no choice about that. So with that in mind, how do you query that data? Today, the idea is that you HAVE to put it into a central location. With tools like Bacalhau[1] and DuckDB [2], you no longer have to - a single query can be sharded amongst all your data - EFFECTIVELY giving you a lot of what you want from a data lake.

It's not a replacement, but if you can do a few of these items WITHOUT moving the data, you will be able to see really significant cost and time savings.

[1] https://github.com/bacalhau-project/bacalhau

[2] https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb

[4] Switch to Push-Based Execution Model by Mytherin · Pull Request #2393 · duckdb/duckdb (github.com)

it depends on your query obviously.

In general, I did very deep benchmarking of pg, clickhouse and duckdb, and I sure didn't make stupid mistakes like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36990831

My dataset has 50B rows and 2tb of data, and I think columnar dbs are very overhiped and I chose pg because:

- pg performance is acceptable, maybe 2-3x times slower than clickhouse and duckdb on some queries if pg is configured correctly and run on compressed storage

- clickhouse and duckdb start falling apart very fast because they specialized on very narrow type of queries: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/47520 https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/47521 https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/discussions/6696

This action installs duckdb with the version provided in input.

Duckdb: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb - seems pretty popular, been keeping an eye on this for close to a year now.

The Parquet-Go library is very complex, not yet success to use it. So I ask whether DuckDB can provide API https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/issues/7776

Another cool new feature that's not mentioned in the blog post is function chaining:

https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/pull/6725

I've been using DuckDB for filtering and post-processing data, specially strings, and this will make writing complex queries easier. By combining nested functions[0] and text functions[1], sometimes I don't even need to go into a Python notebook.

[0]: https://duckdb.org/docs/sql/functions/nested

[1]: https://duckdb.org/docs/sql/functions/char