hypothesis VS go

Compare hypothesis vs go and see what are their differences.

hypothesis

Hypothesis is a powerful, flexible, and easy to use library for property-based testing. (by HypothesisWorks)

go

The Go programming language (by golang)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
hypothesis go
20 2060
7,225 118,871
1.2% 1.2%
9.9 10.0
5 days ago 2 days ago
Python Go
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

hypothesis

Posts with mentions or reviews of hypothesis. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-12.
  • A Tale of Two Kitchens - Hypermodernizing Your Python Code Base
    31 projects | dev.to | 12 Nov 2023
    Hypothesis for Property-Based Testing: Hypothesis is a Python library facilitating property-based testing. It offers a distinct advantage by generating a wide array of input data based on specified properties or invariants within the code. The perks of Hypothesis include:
  • Pix2tex: Using a ViT to convert images of equations into LaTeX code
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Nov 2023
    But then add tests! Tests for LaTeX equations that had never been executable as code.

    https://github.com/HypothesisWorks/hypothesis :

    > Hypothesis is a family of testing libraries which let you write tests parametrized by a source of examples. A Hypothesis implementation then generates simple and comprehensible examples that make your tests fail. This simplifies writing your tests and makes them more powerful at the same time, by letting software automate the boring bits and do them to a higher standard than a human would, freeing you to focus on the higher level test logic.

    > This sort of testing is often called "property-based testing", and the most widely known implementation of the concept is the Haskell library QuickCheck, but Hypothesis differs significantly from QuickCheck and is designed to fit idiomatically and easily into existing styles of testing that you are used to, with absolutely no familiarity with Haskell or functional programming needed.

  • Python toolkits
    38 projects | /r/Python | 15 Jul 2022
    Hypothesis to generate dummy data for test.
  • Best way to test GraphQL API using Python?
    4 projects | /r/graphql | 28 Jun 2022
    To create your own test cases, I recommend you use hypothesis-graphql in combination with hypothesis. hypothesis is a property-based testing library. Property-based testing is an approach to testing in which you make assertions about the result of a test given certain conditions and parameters. For example, if you have a mutation that requires a boolean parameter, you can assert that the client will receive an error if it sends a different type. hypothesis-graphql is a GraphQL testing library that knows how to use hypothesis strategies to generate query documents.
  • Fuzzcheck (a structure-aware Rust fuzzer)
    4 projects | /r/rust | 26 Feb 2022
    The Hypothesis stateful testing code is somewhat self-contained, since it mostly builds on top of internal APIs that already existed.
  • Running C unit tests with pytest
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Feb 2022
    We've had a lot of success combining that approach with property-based testing (https://github.com/HypothesisWorks/hypothesis) for the query engine at backtrace: https://engineering.backtrace.io/2020-03-11-how-hard-is-it-t... .
  • Machine Readable Specifications at Scale
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 26 Jan 2022
    Systems I've used for this include https://agda.readthedocs.io/en/v2.6.0.1/getting-started/what... https://coq.inria.fr https://www.idris-lang.org and https://isabelle.in.tum.de

    An easier alternative is to try disproving the statement, by executing it on thousands of examples and seeing if any fail. That gives us less confidence than a full proof, but can still be better than traditional "there exists" tests. This is called property checking or property-based testing. Systems I've used for this include https://hypothesis.works https://hackage.haskell.org/package/QuickCheck https://scalacheck.org and https://jsverify.github.io

  • Top 5 decentralized app development frameworks
    4 projects | dev.to | 29 Nov 2021
    Unlike other frameworks mentioned in this article, Brownie’s test language is Python using hypothesis.
  • What Is Property Based Testing?
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Sep 2021
  • Go: Fuzzing Is Beta Ready
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Jun 2021
    People can have different definitions and still communicate usefully, and I think there is not 100% agreement on the exact boundaries between the two.

    That said, for me: they are distinct but related, and that distinction is useful.

    For example, Hypothesis is a popular property testing framework. The authors have more recently created HypoFuzz, which includes this sentence in the introduction:

    “HypoFuzz runs your property-based test suite, using cutting-edge fuzzing techniques and coverage instrumentation to find even the rarest inputs which trigger an error.”

    Being able to talk about fuzzing and property testing as distinct things seems useful — saying something like “We added fuzzing techniques to our property testing framework“ is more meaningful than “We added property testing techniques to our property testing framework“ ;-)

    My personal hope is there will be more convergence, and work to add first-class fuzzing support in a popular language like Go will hopefully help move the primary use case for fuzzing to be about correctness, with security moving to an important but secondary use case.

    [0] https://hypothesis.works

go

Posts with mentions or reviews of go. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-28.
  • Go Enums Still Suck
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 28 Mar 2024
    I have a mountain of respect for Bell Labs and its contributions to the public welfare, and a lot of respect for the current group of alumni, mostly at Google, and mostly affiliated to a greater or lesser degree with golang. I have my differences with one or two of them (Pike telegraphs a wildly overcompensated imposter syndrome, but he’s almost as much of a genius as he acts like he is and who am I to judge on an overcompensated imposter syndrome, moreover when the guy in at the next desk over is Ken Thompson, who wouldn’t be a little intimidated by the legend).

    With that said, golang is too opinionated for its level of adoption, too out-of-touch with emerging consensus (and I’m being generous with “emerging” here, the Either monad is more than an emerging consensus around the right default for error handling), and too insular a leadership to be, in my personal opinion, a key contender outside some narrow niches.

    I’m aware that there are avid advocates for golang on HN, and that I’m liable to upset some of them by saying so, so I’m going to use some examples to illustrate my point and to illustrate that I’ve done my homework before being critical.

    Many, including myself, became aware of what is now called golang via this presentation at Google in 2007 (https://youtu.be/hB05UFqOtFA) introducing Newsqueak, a language Pike was pushing back in the mid-90s with what seems to be limited enthusiasm no greater than the enthusiasm for its predecessor Squeak. Any golang hacker will immediately recognize the language taking shape on the slides.

    I’ve been dabbling with golang for something like a decade now, because I really want to like it. But like a lot of the late labs stuff it seems to have suffered from the dangerous combination of the implications of Richard Gabriel’s Worse is Better observation: it was simpler, faster, cheaper, and ultimately more successful to incrementally adapt innovations from Plan9 into Linux (and other Unices), to adapt innovations from sam and acme into nvim/emacs (and now VSCode), and to adapt channel-based and other principled concurrency from Newsqueak/golang (not to mention Erlang and other more full-throated endorsements of that region of the design space) into now countless other languages ranging from things like TypeScript and Rust at the high end of adoption all the way to things like Haskell at more moderate levels of adoption. Ironically enough, the success of UTF-8 (a compromise for the non-ASCII world but the compromise that made it happen at all) is this same principle in action via the same folks!

    And golang would be fine as yet another interesting language serving as a testbed for more pragmatic applications of radical ideas: but it’s got corporate sponsorship that puts Sun Microsystems and Java to shame in scale and scope, but done quietly enough to not set off the same alarm bells.

    The best example of this is probably this GitHub issue: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/19991 (though there are countless like it). I’ve worked with Tony Arcieri, he’s brilliant and humble and hard-working and while we haven’t kept in touch, I keep an eye out, and he’s clearly passionate about the success of golang. But proposal after proposal for some variation of the Either monad has died on procedural grounds for nearly a decade, all while being about the only thing that everyone else agrees on in modern industrial PLT: TypeScript supports it, Rust supports it, C++ de-facto supports it via things like abseil and folly, and of course the hard-core functional community never even bothered with something worse in the modern era. You can even kind of do it, but there are intentional limitations in the way generics get handled across compilation units to ensure it never gets adopted as a community-driven initiative. Try if you don’t believe me (my golang code has a Result type via emacs lisp I wrote).

    Another example is the really weird compilation chain: countless serious people have weighed in here, I’ll elide all the classics because most people making these arguments have their own favorite language and they’ve all been on HN dozens of times, but a custom assembly language is a weird thing to have done, almost no one outside the hardcore golang community thinks it’s sane, the problems is creates for build systems and FFI and just everything about actually running the stuff are completely unnecessary: there are other IRs, not all of them are LLVM IR if you’ve got some beef with LLVM IR, and given that go doesn’t seriously target FFI as more than a weird black sheep (cgo) there’s, ya know, assembly language. It’s a parting shot from the Plan9 diehards with the industrial clout to make it stick.

    The garbage collection story is getting better but it’s an acknowledged handicap in a MxN threading model context, it’s not a secret or controversial even among the maintainers. See the famous “Two Knobs” talk.

    Raw pointers, sum types, dependency management, build, generics that never get there, FFI: solved problem after solved problem killed by pocket veto, explained away, minimized, all with mega-bucks, quiet as a gopher corporate sponsorship fighting a Cold War against Sun and the JVM that doesn’t exist anymore marketed by appealing to the worst instincts of otherwise unimpeachable luminaries of computing.

    There is great software written in golang by engineers I aspire to as role models (TailScale and Brad respectively as maybe the best example). I had to get serious about learning golang and how to work around its ideologically-motivated own-goals because I got serious about WebRTC and Pion (another great piece of software). But it sucks. I dread working on that part of the stack.

    Go enums do suck, but that’s because we pay a very heavy price for golang being mainstream at all: we’ve thrown away ZooKeeper and engineer-millennia of garbage-collector work and countless other treasures, it sucks oxygen out of the room on more plausible C successors like D and Jai and Nim and Zig and V and (it pains me to admit but it’s true) Rust.

    Yes there is great software in golang, tons of it. Yes there are iconic legends who are passionate about it, yes it brought new stuff to the party and the mainstream.

    But the cost was too high.

  • Debugging a Golang Bug with Non-Blocking Reads
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Mar 2024
    Go team does acknowledge [1] it as a bug, so there is some point here

    However, that said, I wonder if OP (duckdb) could have written their solution [2] differently. Shouldn't they be able to select from a Pipe as well as Error channel simultaneously? (similar to how they are doing it inside here [3]). If not, I would have create a go-routine that does blocking read on the Pipe and then pass it on to another channel to select on.

    [1] https://github.com/golang/go/issues/66239

    [2] https://github.com/scratchdata/scratchdata/blob/7c1a0fcd0e20...

    [3] https://github.com/scratchdata/scratchdata/blob/7c1a0fcd0e20...

  • Golang Web: GET Method
    5 projects | dev.to | 10 Mar 2024
    GitHub repository
    5 projects | dev.to | 10 Mar 2024
    Official Website
  • Top Paying Programming Technologies 2024
    19 projects | dev.to | 6 Mar 2024
    10. Go - $92,760
  • 7 Programming Languages Every Cloud Engineer Should Know in 2024!
    4 projects | dev.to | 5 Mar 2024
    Go, or Golang, designed by Google, has become increasingly popular among cloud engineers for building high-performance and scalable cloud services. Its efficiency, simplicity, and built-in support for concurrency make it an excellent choice for developing microservices, distributed systems, and containerized applications. Go's compatibility with cloud platforms and its ability to handle heavy network traffic and complex processing tasks efficiently contribute to its growing adoption in cloud infrastructure projects.
  • Nuke: A memory arena implementation for Go
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Mar 2024
  • 🤓 My top 3 Go packages that I wish I'd known about earlier
    6 projects | dev.to | 1 Mar 2024
    ✨ In recent months, I have been developing web projects using GOTTHA stack: Go + Templ + Tailwind CSS + htmx + Alpine.js. As soon as I'm ready to talk about all the subtleties and pitfalls, I'll post it on my social networks.
  • Memory Safe TLS Library Now Has AWS Crypto and FIPS
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Feb 2024
    And they now have to deal with the same kind of timing attacks related stuff as everybody else, so they lag behind: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/49702
  • querySrv errors when connecting to MongoDB Atlas
    3 projects | dev.to | 29 Feb 2024
    Building with Go 1.11+ and using connection strings with the mongodb+srv scheme is unfortunately incompatible with some DNS servers in the wild due to the change introduced in https://github.com/golang/go/issues/10622. You may receive an error with the message "cannot unmarshal DNS message" while running an operation when using DNS servers that non-compliantly compress SRV records. Old versions of kube-dns and the native DNS resolver (systemd-resolver) on Ubuntu 18.04 are known to be non-compliant in this manner. We suggest using a different DNS server (8.8.8.8 is the common default), and, if that's not possible, avoiding the mongodb+srv scheme.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing hypothesis and go you can also consider the following projects:

v - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io

TinyGo - Go compiler for small places. Microcontrollers, WebAssembly (WASM/WASI), and command-line tools. Based on LLVM.

zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.

pytest - The pytest framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing

Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).

Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀

golang-developer-roadmap - Roadmap to becoming a Go developer in 2020

RxGo - Reactive Extensions for the Go language.

Robot Framework - Generic automation framework for acceptance testing and RPA

React - The library for web and native user interfaces.

crystal - The Crystal Programming Language

grule-rule-engine - Rule engine implementation in Golang