hypothesis-testing
Play
Our great sponsors
| hypothesis-testing | Play | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | |
| 0 | 12,436 | |
| - | 0.1% | |
| 1.8 | 9.5 | |
| over 2 years ago | 5 days ago | |
| Scala | Scala | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
hypothesis-testing
We haven't tracked posts mentioning hypothesis-testing yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
Play
-
Reflex – Web apps in pure Python
My major complain here is that, as far as being a web framework there is precious little information here about the framework. How does this framework scale with multiple requests? What concurrency strategy is it using (threads, processes, actors, etc?). Is this opinionated (it doesn't seem so but it also doesn't say it isn't either). How does this work with popular libraries x,y,z. The full docs have a little bit more information, but not a ton. But mostly there are some cute toy examples and "built in python" and thats about it.
Lets compare this with for example play https://www.playframework.com/ I know from this that it built on Akka, its stateless, aims for predictable resource consumption, has non-blocking io, etc. There is a ton of really important information on what does this web framework actually do that is really important when you are making a choice of a framework.
I have no idea how good this framework is, but besides a few toy examples, I can't see anything that makes me thing "wow this is great I need to use this".
- Scala opensource projects
-
What is scala's modern Web API framework?
Scala 3 migration isn't as simple as migrating other apps, you can track the work at https://github.com/playframework/playframework/issues/11260
-
what library/framework should I use for backend development?
However do note, Play should be perfectly usable as well, and it's still maintained by the community: https://github.com/playframework/playframework/issues/11649
-
Why I selected Elixir and Phoenix as my main stack
In university I learned a bit of Java, so maybe I could use it professionally I guess?. There were many options to choose from. DropWizard, Spark, Play Framework. But the more documented one in the internet I found was Springboot, besides there were some courses in spanish and some friends that knew something about Springboot, so I give it a chance.
-
Make your zip packages for lambdas (and many more use cases) idempotent with a zip-drop-in replacement
See https://github.com/playframework/playframework/issues/10572 and https://github.com/sbt/sbt/issues/6235 for more details and context.
-
Pleasant to use Scala libraries
The most popular nowadays are - I guess - akka-http and http4s. You can also use Play if you don't want to start from scratch but prefer a framework-based approach.
- Why We’re Sticking with Ruby on Rails at GitLab
- O que estou fazendo?? Um projetinho de estudo.
-
Play Framework: first release based at Open Collective
release notes: https://github.com/playframework/playframework/releases/2.8.13
What are some alternatives?
Spring Boot - Spring Boot
Scalatra - Tiny Scala high-performance, async web framework, inspired by Sinatra
Finatra - Fast, testable, Scala services built on TwitterServer and Finagle
Quarkus - Quarkus: Supersonic Subatomic Java.
Lift - Lift Framework
Http4s - A minimal, idiomatic Scala interface for HTTP
Spring - Spring Framework
Skinny Framework - :monorail: "Scala on Rails" - A full-stack web app framework for rapid development in Scala
Apache Wicket - Apache Wicket - Component-based Java web framework
Colossus - I/O and Microservice library for Scala
Vaadin - Vaadin 6, 7, 8 is a Java framework for modern Java web applications.
Ratpack - Lean & powerful HTTP apps