Firefly VS ActiveJ

Compare Firefly vs ActiveJ and see what are their differences.

Firefly

Firefly is an asynchronous web framework for rapid development of high-performance web application. (by hypercube1024)
Web Frameworks Web HTTP HTTP Server HTTP Client HTTP2 TCP Asynchronous web-framework High Performance Kotlin Reactive Reactive Programming TLS WebSocket Oauth2
Source Code
fireflysource.com
Suggest alternative
Edit details

ActiveJ

ActiveJ is an alternative Java platform built from the ground up. ActiveJ redefines core, web and high-load programming in Java, providing simplicity, maximum performance and scalability (by activej)
Projects Web Frameworks Java Framework Web Dependency Injection Serializer Code Generation Async Microservice RPC High Performance Microservices rpc-framework
Source Code
activej.io
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
Firefly ActiveJ
- 4
295 816
- 3.0%
6.0 9.3
about 2 months ago about 15 hours ago
Java Java
Apache License 2.0 Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Firefly

Posts with mentions or reviews of Firefly. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning Firefly yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

ActiveJ

Posts with mentions or reviews of ActiveJ. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2020-10-19.
  • ActiveInject. Fast and Lightweight Dependency Injection Library
    4 projects | dev.to | 19 Oct 2020
    Scope creates “local singletons” which live as long as the scope itself. ActiveInject scopes are a bit different from other DI libraries. The internal structure of the Injector is a prefix tree and the prefix is a scope. If you create an Injector that is set to a particular scope, it means that Injector enters this scope. This can be done several times, so that there are multiple injectors in a single scope.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Firefly and ActiveJ you can also consider the following projects:

Spring Boot - Spring Boot

DSL-JSON - High performance JVM JSON library

ktor - Framework for quickly creating connected applications in Kotlin with minimal effort

rpc-bench - RPC Benchmark of gRPC, Aeron and KryoNet

Jooby - The modular web framework for Java and Kotlin

opentest - Open source test automation tool for web applications, mobile apps and APIs

wasabi - An HTTP Framework

Seata - :fire: Seata is an easy-to-use, high-performance, open source distributed transaction solution.

Apache Wicket - Apache Wicket - Component-based Java web framework

rsp - A simple Java web framework for building real-time user interfaces and UI components.

http4k - The Functional toolkit for Kotlin HTTP applications. http4k provides a simple and uniform way to serve, consume, and test HTTP services.

Sentinel - A powerful flow control component enabling reliability, resilience and monitoring for microservices. (面向云原生微服务的高可用流控防护组件)

Firefly vs Spring Boot ActiveJ vs DSL-JSON Firefly vs ktor ActiveJ vs rpc-bench Firefly vs Jooby ActiveJ vs opentest Firefly vs wasabi ActiveJ vs Seata Firefly vs Apache Wicket ActiveJ vs rsp Firefly vs http4k ActiveJ vs Sentinel