hub VS woodpecker

Use hub here via CLI and forget the gui https://hub.github.com/

Try automating the PR process as much as possible. Make use of tools like hub CLI for speeding up the pull request process. Code quality tools can help you automate the due diligence for coding standards and conventions, and test automation tools can assist in bug discovery, and identifying security vulnerabilities.

You can extend this: https://github.com/github/hub

parse_git_branch() { # Speed up opening up a new terminal tab by not # checking `$HOME` ...which can't be a repo anyway # # For the heck of it, micro-optimize this too: # time (repeat 1000000 { [ "$PWD" = "$HOME" ] } ) == ~4.2s # time (repeat 1000000 { [[ "$PWD" == "$HOME" ]] } ) == ~1.4s [[ "$PWD" == "$HOME" ]] && return # Fastest known way to check the current branch name # (Uses `command` to bypass wrappers like https://hub.github.com/) ref="$(command git symbolic-ref --short HEAD 2> /dev/null)" || return echo " [$ref]" }

Which will create a new remote with that name (otherwise origin will be used).

It is also less typing.

[1]: https://github.com/github/hub

I alias git to use HUB from GitHub

If you also install Hub https://github.com/github/hub it gives you a git create command, it also has a set of really useful additional CLI utilities.

SCM: Git + Hub (https://github.com/github/hub)

https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker

Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.

Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker

> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline

I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/

Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...

https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io

https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].

I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].

[1]: http://woodpecker-ci.org/

The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/