hub-feedback VS Harbor

Hello from Docker! This message shows that your installation appears to be working correctly. To generate this message, Docker took the following steps: 1. The Docker client contacted the Docker daemon. 2. The Docker daemon pulled the "hello-world" image from the Docker Hub. (amd64) 3. The Docker daemon created a new container from that image which runs the executable that produces the output you are currently reading. 4. The Docker daemon streamed that output to the Docker client, which sent it to your terminal. To try something more ambitious, you can run an Ubuntu container with: $ docker run -it ubuntu bash Share images, automate workflows, and more with a free Docker ID: https://hub.docker.com/ For more examples and ideas, visit: https://docs.docker.com/get-started/

You will need to check if there is a ARM variant of the container, should say on the docker hub website https://hub.docker.com/

Go to Docker Hub and sign in with your docker hub account

What is your lab environment doing? That's the CDN for Docker Hub based on https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/2218

The whole thing should also work on GitHub as an automized process with a Docker container, AFAIK. I don't know a lot about that and depending on your skills with this type of things, it could be a bit challenging to set this up, but worth the effort for many projects.

FROM node:16-alpine will get a light weight Linux distribution with node version 16 installed on it, You can get image of any other OS you may prefer from Docker hub.

Note: Before doing that, make sure to have a Docker Hub account and with its credentials, sign in using docker login command in your local machine.

Open the dockerhub page and log in. You will see the image available there.

Server with proxmox -> Ubuntu Server VM @ 192.168.1.169 with docker installed. I installed pihole using the hub.docker.com yaml file. The only change I had to make to it was the ports since they were already in use by other containers (this may be an issue?) I changed the ports as follows:

I use gitlab and it serves the purpose, although I would not recommend using gitlab just for docker registry. You can give harbour a try. This is opensource and is self hosted docker registry

What about https://goharbor.io/ ?

Out of those two, I've only used Harbor - which I highly recommend. It will accomplish everything you need it to, while offering greater security. From https://goharbor.io/ "Harbor is an open source registry that secures artifacts with policies and role-based access control, ensures images are scanned and free from vulnerabilities, and signs images as trusted."

The default settings for the https://goharbor.io/ container registry knocked every application in my cluster offline :(

https://github.com/goharbor/harbor - docker registry

I don't know if this is light weight enough but I have some experience with [Harbor](https://goharbor.io/) for our company. The ACL it presents is simple enough. Maybe it was just our implementation but it ended running a lot of components on our cluster so I can't vouch for local use.

I ended up replacing it with AWS ECR. We only have a couple of container repos so ECR only ends up costing a few dollars per month. Not local, but very easy and almost free.

I would go with Harbor https://goharbor.io/