HTML::Pipeline VS Ox

Compare HTML::Pipeline vs Ox and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
HTML::Pipeline Ox
- 1
2,260 890
- -
7.8 5.2
10 days ago 1 day ago
Ruby C
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

HTML::Pipeline

Posts with mentions or reviews of HTML::Pipeline. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning HTML::Pipeline yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

Ox

Posts with mentions or reviews of Ox. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTML::Pipeline and Ox you can also consider the following projects:

Nokogiri - Nokogiri (鋸) makes it easy and painless to work with XML and HTML from Ruby.

Oga - Oga is an XML/HTML parser written in Ruby.

HappyMapper - Object to XML mapping library, using Nokogiri (Fork from John Nunemaker's Happymapper)

Oj - Optimized JSON

TOML - Parse TOML. Like a bawss.

ROXML - ROXML is a module for binding Ruby classes to XML. It supports custom mapping and bidirectional marshalling between Ruby and XML using annotation-style class methods, via Nokogiri or LibXML.