horovod VS netron

Broke: using Horovod

And in case scaling is really important to you. May I suggest you look into Horovod?

Training is not the same as inference (doing the segmentation), so that scale is probably off by a lot. One or two orders of magnitude just depending on the specifics of what hardware you're running on, and your training and eval dataset would be several orders of magnitude smaller. FAANGs would parallelize that training as well (don't remember if UNet is inherently parallelizable for training) via their internal equivalent of Horovod, so they'll do a GPU-month worth of training in less than a day.

[[email protected]] match_arg (utils/args/args.c:163): unrecognized argument quiet [[email protected]] HYDU_parse_array (utils/args/args.c:178): argument matching returned error [[email protected]] parse_args (ui/mpich/utils.c:1639): error parsing input array [[email protected]] HYD_uii_mpx_get_parameters (ui/mpich/utils.c:1691): unable to parse user arguments [[email protected]] main (ui/mpich/mpiexec.c:127): error parsing parameters I believe this is due to mpich being installed: https://github.com/horovod/horovod/issues/1637

Check out Horovod - https://github.com/horovod/horovod

If you just want to run tensorflow or pytorch for a Jupyter notebook, setting the environment shouldn't be difficult. I know that AWS has a marketplace of preconfigured images. However, you can go as advanced as setting up a cluster of gpu-equipped nodes to setup Horovod (https://github.com/horovod/horovod) to do distributed machine learning. Yes, there's a learning curve, but you cannot acquire this skillet any other way.

I'm the maintainer for an open source project called Horovod that allows you to distribute deep learning training (e.g., TensorFlow) on platforms like Spark.

You'll want to use horovod to run keras in a distributed system. Then use Slurm to manage the cluster and run the job.

In exploring open-source projects, I've come across several promising tools capable of managing deep-learning models for images. Significantly, tools such as NETRON provide visualization of neural networks, while SHAP can be used for evaluating the significance of outputs.

We need to find out the exact input and output tensor names. A tool like Netron makes this super easy. Open the original .tflite and/or the ONNX model in Netron and click the Model Properties button in the lower left corner.

How is this different from e.g Netron https://github.com/lutzroeder/netron

Netron (https://netron.app/) is the best and mostly used NN visualizer. Just save your model and then simply load it via netron to look its layers and weights. If you want a more complex visualization then you can also play with Zetane ( but its paid, also have a free version) engine.