q VS duckdb

CSV utilities (still haven't pick a favorite one...): https://github.com/harelba/q https://github.com/BurntSushi/xsv https://github.com/wireservice/csvkit https://github.com/johnkerl/miller

I think they're talking about https://github.com/harelba/q, which is not very fast.

Apparently, there were many who thought the same thing; Tools to execute SQL against CSV were trdsql, q, csvq, TextQL. They were highly functional, hoewver, had many options and no input completion. I found it just a little difficult to use.

Hi, author of q here.

Regarding the error you got, q currently does not autodetect headers, so you'd need to add -H as a flag in order to use the "country" column name. You're absolutely correct on failing-fast here - It's a bug which i'll fix.

In general regarding speed - q supports automatic caching of the CSV files (through the "-C readwrite" flag). Once it's activated, it will write the data into another file (with a .qsql extension), and will use it automatically in further queries in order to speed things considerably.

Effectively, the .qsql files are regular sqlite3 files (with some metadata), and q can be used to query them directly (or any regular sqlite3 file), including the ability to seamlessly join between multiple sqlite3 files.

http://harelba.github.io/q/#auto-caching-examples

I'm not sure if the fix is reassuring or not: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/pull/9411/files

It's an interesting question!

The problem is that the data is spread everywhere - no choice about that. So with that in mind, how do you query that data? Today, the idea is that you HAVE to put it into a central location. With tools like Bacalhau[1] and DuckDB [2], you no longer have to - a single query can be sharded amongst all your data - EFFECTIVELY giving you a lot of what you want from a data lake.

It's not a replacement, but if you can do a few of these items WITHOUT moving the data, you will be able to see really significant cost and time savings.

[1] https://github.com/bacalhau-project/bacalhau

[2] https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb

[4] Switch to Push-Based Execution Model by Mytherin · Pull Request #2393 · duckdb/duckdb (github.com)

it depends on your query obviously.

In general, I did very deep benchmarking of pg, clickhouse and duckdb, and I sure didn't make stupid mistakes like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36990831

My dataset has 50B rows and 2tb of data, and I think columnar dbs are very overhiped and I chose pg because:

- pg performance is acceptable, maybe 2-3x times slower than clickhouse and duckdb on some queries if pg is configured correctly and run on compressed storage

- clickhouse and duckdb start falling apart very fast because they specialized on very narrow type of queries: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/47520 https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/47521 https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/discussions/6696

This action installs duckdb with the version provided in input.

Duckdb: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb - seems pretty popular, been keeping an eye on this for close to a year now.

The Parquet-Go library is very complex, not yet success to use it. So I ask whether DuckDB can provide API https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/issues/7776