hacn VS FSharpPlus

Compare hacn vs FSharpPlus and see what are their differences.

hacn

A "monad" or DSL for creating React components using Fable and F# computation expressions (by pj)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
hacn FSharpPlus
4 6
34 816
- 1.7%
0.0 8.8
11 months ago about 1 month ago
F# F#
- Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

hacn

Posts with mentions or reviews of hacn. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-12.

FSharpPlus

Posts with mentions or reviews of FSharpPlus. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-09.
  • Don Syme explains the downsides of type classes and the technical and philosophical reasons for not implementing them in F#
    3 projects | /r/haskell | 9 Sep 2021
    There maybe be a way to make it not have overhead. But there is precedent that this is not the case with Statically Resolved Type Parameters, and existing mechanism in F# that already lets you encode Haskell-style typeclasses and is the backbone of FSharpPlus, a typelevel (and more) library for F#. Solving constraints like this at compile-time (as opposed to having a runtime natively understand them) absolutely, positively leads to explosive compile times if you're not careful. I worked on the F# compiler for 5 years and I can attest to numerous reports related to accidental compile-time explosions just because SRTPs or inline was used a particular way.
  • Practically speaking, what does F#'s lack of higher-typed kinds mean?
    2 projects | /r/fsharp | 7 Jul 2021
    F# devs tend to use SRTP (Statically resolved type parameters) see F#+ https://github.com/fsprojects/FSharpPlus .
    2 projects | /r/fsharp | 7 Jul 2021
    There are some ways to emulate this using SRTP (statically resolved type parameters), that are inlined at compile time (more like C++ templates). This is used in https://github.com/fsprojects/FSharpPlus
  • F#+ 1.2 Released 🔷🚀
    2 projects | /r/fsharp | 7 Jun 2021
    F#+ (FSharpPlus) 1.2 released with the following changes:

What are some alternatives?

When comparing hacn and FSharpPlus you can also consider the following projects:

language-ext - C# functional language extensions - a base class library for functional programming

aether - Optics for F#

fslang-suggestions - The place to make suggestions, discuss and vote on F# language and core library features

jarvis - An AI sidekick that helps you control your computer.

PipeScore - A web-based bagpipe notation app.

logsuck - Easy log aggregation, indexing and searching

Mondocks - An alternative way to interact with MongoDB databases from F# that allows you to use mongo-idiomatic constructs

wcp

NoSQL - A NoSQL implementation DBMS using LSM Trees

opencv_py

shopipy - A Shopify API client for Pyhton with async support

flask-unchained - The quickest and easiest way to build large web apps and APIs with Flask