guildai VS metaflow

Experiment tracking in DvC is implemented using git to store snapshots of a project and related artifacts. You might take a look at Guild AI's support for DvC, which is tightly integrated with DvC stages. You can run any of the stages defined for a project and you get a properly isolated run (each run is a project copy to ensure that you're not corrupting the run if you modify files while it's running - as well as properly supporting concurrent runs). Once you have runs in Guild, you can use any number of tools to study, compare, export, etc.

I built an experiment tracking tool (Guild AI) that focuses on code/model reuse and so this question is dear to my heart :) Best of luck!

I'm not aware of experiment tracking in Jupyter notebooks themselves. Guild AI is able to run notebooks as experiments however.

Disclosure - I'm the author of Guild AI so take this for the biased opinion that it is.

I'm the author of Guild AI (open source experiment tracking). For some time now Guild users have asked for DvC support. This is now available as a pre-release.

Guild AI now has support for running DvC stages as experiments. DvC uses git under the covers to manage project state for each experiment, along with the experiment results. Guild doesn't touch your git repo and instead copies your project source to a new run directory. This ensures that you have a correct record of your experiment without churning your project state.

Guild.ai - https://guild.ai/

Use guild and pytorch-lightning. Make it easy for new contributors to get your data by using dvc as a data access tool.

I would recommend the following: - https://www.mage.ai/ - https://dagster.io/ - https://www.prefect.io/ - https://metaflow.org/ - https://zenml.io/home

1) I've been looking into [Metaflow](https://metaflow.org/), which connects nicely to AWS, does a lot of heavy lifting for you, including scheduling.

even for people who don't have an ML background there's now a lot of very fully-featured model deployment environments that allow self-hosting (kubeflow has a good self-hosting option, as do mlflow and metaflow), handle most of the complicated stuff involved in just deploying an individual model, and work pretty well off the shelf.

They had to figure out video compression that worked at the volume that they wanted to deliver. They had to build and maintain their own CDN to be able to have a always available and consistent viewing experience. Don’t even get me started on the resiliency tools like hystrix that they were kind enough to open source. I mean, they have their own fucking data science framework and they’re looking into using neural networks to downscale video.. Sound familiar? That’s cause that’s practically the same thing as Nvidia’s DLSS (which upscales instead of downscales).

Check out Metaflow by Netflix

Github Actions, Metaflow and AWS SageMaker are awesome technologies by themselves however they are seldom used together in the same sentence, even less so in the same Machine Learning project.

It's undeniable that leadership is instrumental in any company and project success, however I was intrigued with one of their ML tool choices that helped them reach their goal. I was so curious about this choice that I just had to learn more about it, so in this article will be talking about a sound strategy of effectively scaling your AI/ML undertaking and a tool that makes this possible - Metaflow.