guide VS golang-standards/project-layout

I'm pumped to learn Python. Are there any learning tools or docs I should focus on? For Go I liked the Uber Go Style Guide which represents a modern and idiomatic approach to Go and is a good tour of the language itself (for experienced engineers.) Is there something similar for Python?

https://github.com/uber-go/guide/blob/master/style.md - must have, write good go code from the beginning.

I really recommend reading: - Effective Go: https://go.dev/doc/effective_go#errors - Style Guide(by Uber): https://github.com/uber-go/guide/blob/master/style.md

As you see - there are no reference to any technology or framework. There are a lot of best-practices for almost any framework, so you can choose an appropriate one. For example - if you're a rails developer, then you can check https://github.com/rubocop/ruby-style-guide and https://github.com/rubocop/rails-style-guide but if you're a golang developer - https://github.com/uber-go/guide/blob/master/style.md and https://developers.mattermost.com/contribute/more-info/server/style-guide/

Read ubers style guide first, its good to have some base rules that you follow when beggining. Heres the link: https://github.com/uber-go/guide/blob/master/style.md.

cmd: here where we will leave the main.go that starts our app.

> https://github.com/golang-standards/project-layout

The name of the repo is really and intentionally misleading. rsc filled an issue there to point this out, but the repo maintainer just disabled issues altogether so now no one can see it.

Even when it would not have such parasitic name, many seasoned Go programmers, me included, consider the self-proclaimed "Standard Go project Layout" as the opposite of what is good and advisable.

Unfortunately, the name just works, so it is being recommended all over the Internet since its inception.

Your comment makes it look as if you're saying you hate the Go development team, but it seems that isn't the case.

I get a little of what you're saying, I wouldn't say I hate anyone, but I strongly dislike how a lot of projects are organized. I think a lot stems from https://github.com/golang-standards/project-layout , which pretended to be standard and was so (ab)used one of the creators opened an issue about it. If you look at the actual Go src, it's much, much cleaner.

So you don't get blind sided for self proclaimed "standards" that are not

I am writing a project that has two components: a CLI and a library. I've organised the project as follows (as per organisation instructions):

Familiarity with the standard Golang project structure, which you can find here.

I've been learning how to build web applications using different frameworks and languages for a while now, such as Laravel with its MVC architecture and Node.js following the 'Hapi.js Way'. As I'm trying to create a new portfolio project using Go, I found myself contemplating over the ideal project structure. I wanted something that not only aligns with the standard Go project layout, but also makes the code both easy to write and understand. That's when I stumbled upon the concept of Hexagonal Architecture, as showcased in Netflix's engineering blog. The idea of seamlessly swapping infrastructures with minimal code changes fascinated me, and I decided to implement it in my new project.