groq-test-suite VS cson

Compare groq-test-suite vs cson and see what are their differences.

groq-test-suite

GROQ test suite (by sanity-io)
Suggest topics
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

cson

CoffeeScript-Object-Notation. Same as JSON but for CoffeeScript objects. (by bevry)
cson Coffeescript JSON data-format NodeJS Executable
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
SurveyJS
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
Our great sponsors
groq-test-suite cson
1 1
10 1,335
- 0.1%
5.0 5.7
18 days ago 4 months ago
JavaScript CoffeeScript
- GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

groq-test-suite

Posts with mentions or reviews of groq-test-suite. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-03.
  • The Norway Problem
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Apr 2021
    TOML also has a few restrictions, such as not supporting mixed-type arrays like [1, "hello", true], or arrays at the root of the data. JSON can represent any TOML value (as far as I know), but TOML cannot represent any JSON value.

    At my company we use YAML a lot for table-driven tests (e.g. [1]), and this not only means lots of nested arrays, but also having to represent pure data (i.e. the expected output of a test), which requires a format that supports encoding arbitrary data structures.

    [1] https://github.com/sanity-io/groq-test-suite/

cson

Posts with mentions or reviews of cson. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-03.
  • The Norway Problem
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Apr 2021
    I prefer JSON over YAML because I spend more time confused and burned by the problems caused by it.

    I understand that people don't like directly use JSON because it's not very friendly: no comments, no multi-line string, etc.

    A great alternative IMHO is cson[0]. It's like JSON to JavaScript but for CoffeeScript (though nobody talks about it nowadays). It has indentation-based syntax, comments, and multiline string which usually don't need to escape. The advantage is it's close enough to JSON which is the canonical format that everybody can agree on nowadays. For YAML and TOML there are too many visual part-aways from JSON.

    Or just create a JSON variant that enables comments and the backtick multiline string from JavaScript.

    [0] https://github.com/bevry/cson

What are some alternatives?

When comparing groq-test-suite and cson you can also consider the following projects:

yamllint - A linter for YAML files.

jsonnet - Jsonnet - The data templating language

lua-patterns - Exposing Lua string patterns to Rust

strictyaml - Type-safe YAML parser and validator.

tao-data-js - TAO data JavaScript module

ron - Rusty Object Notation

edn - Extensible Data Notation

cue - CUE has moved to https://github.com/cue-lang/cue

bip39 - BIP-39 tools using Node and implemented in Coffeescript

jadelet - Pure and simple clientside templates

toml.io - Source Code for toml.io

groq-test-suite vs yamllint cson vs jsonnet groq-test-suite vs lua-patterns cson vs strictyaml groq-test-suite vs tao-data-js cson vs ron cson vs edn cson vs cue cson vs lua-patterns cson vs bip39 cson vs jadelet cson vs toml.io