graphjin VS pg_graphql

This one looks interesting if you like GraphQL… https://graphjin.com

You're right. Django made a ton of tables, and it's pretty insightful to think about all the stuff it's trying to consider and a nightmare to migrate that framework. Django might have simplified some stuff, but it's still too opaque for my taste and the overall end goals of the project. Currently, I'm testing using graphjin (it doesn't have the best documentation, but it does boast an SQL generation capability that I philosophically think is the best way to do things).

Checkout GraphJin it's an automatic GraphQL to SQL compiler, you write your database queries in GraphQL instead of SQL and it compiles them into efficient SQL on the fly. Works as a library in GO and NodeJS. https://github.com/dosco/graphjin

In GraphJin an automatic GraphQL to SQL compiler we use the gnomock library it startups a database instance (docker) then create the schema and tests data and finally our code connects to it and runs a series of tests. We run these across Mysql, Postgres and a few other DB's. Gnomock supports a wide range of them. Right now we don't take down the db for every test only between test runs but its fast enough that we could. This whole thing runs of a simple `go test -v .` command and we run it on every commit using a githook. https://github.com/dosco/graphjin/blob/master/tests/dbint_te...

This was a bug in GraphJin it has since been fixed. The issue was that you were trying to have multiple subscriptions over a single websocket this did not work (it should) and now it does. https://github.com/dosco/graphjin/commit/43e619b2ff392dd42b99a4d56074a041a54b0e1c

Not exactly GraphQL is just a format to define what data you want back from someplace. You can use it in a browser app to request data from a backend GraphQL server or you can use it as an ORM within your backend app to fetch data from a database using a library like GraphJin. https://github.com/dosco/graphjin

Hi, I'm the author of Supabase GraphQL (pg_graphql)

One of the restrictions of composite types is that they can not contain an instance of themselves. So unfortunately, this is not currently possible.

I had this issue when trying to implement an AST type for pg_graphql[1] back when it was written in SQL [2]. In the end we used a JSON type which was much less constrained. That might be solvable using pg_jsonschema [3] if you really wanted to have a good time though

[1] https://github.com/supabase/pg_graphql

It’s something that’ll come in future, but nothing available yet: https://github.com/supabase/pg_graphql/issues/17

But... If you're looking for Graphql/Postgres, maybe look at https://github.com/supabase/pg_graphql which popped onto my radar yesterday, but I have no experience with it.

Check out some of the generated queries this extension [1] pumps out and you might have an answer.

[1] https://github.com/supabase/pg_graphql

hey HN, supabase ceo here. I'm really excited about this release.

Our GraphQL implementation is built on top of pg_graphql[0], a PostgreSQL extension we open-sourced a few months ago. The implementation works with a lot of native PG functionality (like Row Level Security). You can also do a some neat things with PG GRANTS, enabling/disabling access to different tables/columns to effectively serve a different GraphQL API depending who is "logged in".

On Supabase, the extension is served via PostgREST[1] using the public PostgreSQL function exposed by pg_graphql. PostgREST exposes PG functions as RPC routes (in our case we also map /rest/v1/rpc/graphql => /graphql/v1)

I'll ping the main dev (@oli_rice) and make sure he is here to answer any technical questions. This is just one of the exciting features we're launching this week. Stay tuned for one of our most-requested features later this week.

[0] pg_graphql: https://github.com/supabase/pg_graphql

[1] PostgREST: https://postgrest.org/