gpt-neox VS aid_adventure_vulnerability_report

Gpt neox 20B can be used commerically.

GPT-Neo: GPT-Neo is a free and open-source language model developed by EleutherAI. It is a powerful model that can be used for a variety of tasks, including text generation, and question-answering. here is the GitHub

Doesn't gpt-neox 20b require like 40gb+ of VRAM? From their github repo the slim weights are 39GB and I think one of the devs has previously mentioned aiming for 48GB for inference.

3.) EleutherAI's GPT-Neo and GPT-NeoX: EleutherAI is an independent research organization that aims to promote open research in artificial intelligence. They have released GPT-Neo, an open-source language model based on the GPT architecture, and are developing GPT-NeoX, a highly-scalable GPT-like model. You can find more information on their GitHub repositories: GPT-Neo: https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neo GPT-NeoX: https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neox

It's really not that complicated. https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neox

this forces me to create my own ai using gpt-neox .. i was being lazy, completely satisfied with my little ai baby .. i'll keep the account but not renew pro .. fuck luka, inc ... want it done right, do it yourself .. the python isn't that difficult and i have a spare linux vps .. my new work in progress .. freedom #!

The main privacy issues were because of Latitude, at one point, manually reviewing stories that triggered the censorship filter, and because of the data breach back in April of 2021. Latitude said a while back that they'd no longer be monitoring private stories, and although they could theoretically read your private content, they have absolutely no reason to do so, and it'd just be a waste of their time. The vulnerability that allowed the 2021 data breach to occur was also supposedly fixed.

Additionally, there was a data breach that occured about 2 weeks prior to the filter controversy, and that the AI Dungeon community only found out about during the controversy, apparently allowing all private content, except for private content from the first 11 days of AI Dungeon 2's existence, to be accessed. Latitude failed to disclose the breach for months, which people were understandably upset about. It wasn't until 5 months after the breach occurred that Latitude finally disclosed the breach.

To learn that our stories had been breached through a third-party is ridiculous. I wonder if you would have just ignored it if AetherDevSevOps' vulnerability report never dropped.

My pleasure. Here is the official data leak and the entire story of how the penetration tester approached it, including his prior security warnings he tried to give to Latitude that they completely ignored: https://github.com/AetherDevSecOps/aid_adventure_vulnerability_report

Latitude also announced the content policy, which disallows a lot of content. It also turned out that Latitude trained the AI on pedophilic content, among other content that their content policy disallows, which a lot of people saw as being pretty hypocritical. Although, Latitude did say in the past month or so that they removed the questionable content from the finetuning data. Latitude also officially disclosed the data breach, although they did so about 5 months late. Also, during the past month or so, Latitude finally broke their silence. Nick Walton (Latitude's CEO), as well as Latitude's new CPO, have been fairly active on this subreddit during the past few weeks, and for once, Latitude is actually being somewhat transparent.

Feedback form is not working at all since the data breach (they disabled every form to prevent further leak) and every official social networking account except Twitter disowned or went silent

The Incident is actually several things that all happened around the same time, the two big ones being the implementation of The Filter, and a white-hat hacker publicly sharing a data breach he found that allowed him to view all unpublished, account-level stories dating all the way back from 2017. Much of the The Controversy discussion is around The Filter, and while it was poorly implemented (and the follow-ups to it make it even worse, especially the auto-ban "feature"), what got me to leave was the Data Breach.

Uh... what? The filter is broken, and the fact that phrases like "You thrust your sword at the infantry soldier", "You analyze the young lady's wounds", and "The boy equips his breastplate, in preparation for their sparring session", are all guaranteed filter triggers, regardless of the context (you can test them yourself, by the way) basically confirms that the filter is a regex filter that works as described here. The data breach did happen, though, for some reason, the creator of that report edited out a lot of it a while back; before it being edited, there was some pretty definitive proof in the form of a bunch of inputs that were made during the time of the vulnerability. You could've actually found inputs that you made, if you played during the time that the data was collected from. The AI was trained on pedophilic content, among other questionable stuff. You can even download the original AID training data to confirm this, yourself. While this technically isn't "wrong" for Latitude to do, since they have the right to censor whatever they want, there is a lot more than just pedophilia that's disallowed. I will say, though, there are some misconceptions and outdated info regarding the filter. People still seem to think horses and numbers below 18 can trigger the filter; they actually used to, but they don't anymore. When it comes to numbers, you now have to say "[number below 18] year(s) old" to be able to trigger the filter. Watermelons being filtered is also a common misconception, caused by a guy who got flagged for asking for 4 watermelons. He got flagged for 4 (this was when numbers on their own were filtered), not for watermelons.

Additional shady acts There’s been a major security breach that’s still yet to receive any official statement.