got
git-branchless
got | git-branchless | |
---|---|---|
12 | 59 | |
126 | 3,543 | |
0.0% | 1.0% | |
6.1 | 9.2 | |
over 1 year ago | 4 days ago | |
Go | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
got
-
Show HN: A version control system based on rsync
I've not heard the term "probabilistic tree" and I've having difficulty pulling up references. I suspect it's implemented by subpackage ptree[0]. Do you have resources on what makes probabilistic trees different from hash tables?
[0] https://github.com/gotvc/got/tree/master/pkg/gotkv/ptree
-
CDC File Transfer
FastCDC is the same chunking algorithm used in Got.
https://github.com/gotvc/got
-
SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed
Thanks for sharing RocketGit. This is the first time I've heard of it, and yes, it does look like a cool copyleft solution to self-hosted Git.
Another interesting option is Brendan Caroll's got[0], which allows sharing of repositories over INET256[1]. I'm sure there are other P2P approaches to Git, but this one just piqued my interest. Unfortunately it has a naming conflict with OpenBSD's Game of Trees[2].
[0] https://github.com/gotvc/got
[1] https://github.com/inet256/inet256
[2] https://gameoftrees.org/
-
Show HN: Encrypted Git hosting should be easy
I work on a project which solves a similar use case.
https://github.com/gotvc/got
Got also does E2EE encryption, but it can additionally encrypt branch names from remote servers.
-
What Comes After Git
I've been working on a project "Got". Which deals with the LFS problem, mentioned in the post.
https://github.com/gotvc/got
Got isn't really trying to do software version control better than Git. It's trying to make general purpose file versioning practical, with a workflow similar to Git's.
-
Show HN: Let's build an end-to-end encrypted data store
In the same space is the key-value store underlying Got: GotKV. https://github.com/gotvc/got/tree/master/pkg/gotkv
It stores encrypted blobs in any content-addressed store, and provides a copy-on-write key-value store API.
- Got is like Git, but with an 'o'
- Show HN: Got is like Git, but with an 'o'
git-branchless
- Git-branchless: High-velocity, monorepo-scale workflow for Git
-
Ask HN: Git Alternatives – Sapling vs. Jj
You can run the tests on each commit in parallel if you're okay with wasting CPU time to save wall-clock time. git-branchless can speculatively run linear or binary search in parallel up to a user-specified number of jobs [1], and I'd like it add it to jj someday, as it's one of the features I miss most.
(To run the tests in parallel, git-branchless provisions its own worktrees. For binary search, it speculatively executes the search for the potential success and failure cases; when the number of jobs is a power of 2, this partitions the search space evenly.)
[1]: https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless/wiki/Command:-git-...
-
Working with stacked branches in Git is easier with –update-refs
When I was doing more hardcore dev instead of SRE'ing I settled on git branchless, was well worth the experimenting you have to do to get it into your mental model.
now that I hardly ever have 2 layer deep stacks I just settle on my go-to git client which is magit. It just takes a couple of keystrokes to do a couple of stacked rebases.
[1]: https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless
-
Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?
Yes, but due to its simplicity + extensibility + widespread adoption, I wouldn’t be surprised if we’re still using Git 100+ years from now.
The current trend (most popular and IMO likely to succeed) is to make tools (“layers”) which work on top of Git, like more intuitive UI/patterns (https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit, https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless) and smart merge resolvers (https://github.com/Symbolk/IntelliMerge, https://docs.plasticscm.com/semanticmerge/how-to-configure/s...). Git it so flexible, even things that it handles terribly by default, it handles
- Meta developer tools: Working at scale
- Show HN: Gut – An easy-to-use CLI for Git
-
Branchless Workflow for Git
> Is this for a case where a bunch of people branch from master@HEAD (lets call this A), then you need to modify A, so you then need to rebase each branch that branched from A individually?
Mainly it's for when you branch from A multiple times, and then modify A. This can happen if you have some base work that you build multiple features on top of. I routinely do this as part of rapid prototyping, as described here: https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless/wiki/Workflow:-div...
`git undo` shows a list of operations it'll execute, which you have to confirm before accepting. Of course, it's ultimately a matter of trust in the tools you use.
- Where are my Git UI features from the future?
- git-branchless: High-velocity, monorepo-scale workflow for Git
What are some alternatives?
cdc-file-transfer - Tools for synching and streaming files from Windows to Linux
jj - A Git-compatible VCS that is both simple and powerful [Moved to: https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj]
bita - Differential file synchronization over http
graphite-cli - Graphite's CLI makes creating and submitting stacked changes easy.
backup - immutable backups so simple that unborkable
magit - It's Magit! A Git Porcelain inside Emacs.
imsy - simple incremental pull of immutable large files
legit - Git for Humans, Inspired by GitHub for Mac™.
gitless - A maintained fork of the simple git interface
git-cli-tools - Collection of CLI tools for Git.
git-remote-aws - encrypted git hosting should be easy
libgit2 - A cross-platform, linkable library implementation of Git that you can use in your application.