gotop VS bottom

As other users have said, the one on the screenshot is gotop, which was archived close to 3 years ago. I would personally recommend bashtop, which is similar function, it is still developed and it's built in shell and a bit of Python. ofc, this is just my opinion. Hope you find a good system monitor

gotop - Another system monitoring tool, written in Go

Take a look @ example gotop

gotop

gotop looks awesome! Here's a maintained fork that's linked to from the original, archived GitHub repo.

Just for fun. You can download the armv7 bin file from here, and copy it to the kterm main folder. Then run it in kterm by input ./gotop, enjoy!

I like using gotop, written in Go.

Gotop (a system monitor that's more readable than htop IMO)

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cjbassi/gotop /tmp/gotop /tmp/gotop/scripts/download.sh

Seems that is obsolete.

bottom

I'd suggest Bottom as a TUI alternative to the in-built task managers - https://github.com/ClementTsang/bottom

It works on Windows also.

If anyone is looking for a "top" like, written in Rust, might have a look at https://github.com/ClementTsang/bottom

Looks like bottom with another theme

bottom - A cross-platform graphical process/system monitor with a customizable interface and a multitude of features.

As a macOS user, it boils my brain whenever I've to type in something like ~/Library/Application Support/org.rust-lang.Cargo/config.toml. macOS users have been begging CLI tools to support XDG variables on macOS too. Setting defaults is a strong indication to the community what should be the "preferred" locations. The defaults defined in your article will invariably lead to some authors saying that if that path is good enough for cargo, then it is good enough for their tool. Even the latest draft RFC acknowledges that macOS should use XDG variables too. I've written more about this here.