GoQuery VS htmlquery

Your comment was posted 4 minutes ago. That means you still have enough time to edit your comment to change it so it contains real URLs:

<https://github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery>

<https://github.com/dop251/goja>

(Please do not reply to this comment—I won't be able to delete it once the previous post is fixed if it contains replies.)

How about - https://github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery

Assuming you're asking about https://github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery , to interpret your printout you want to look at what Find is defined to return, a *Selection. https://github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery/blob/39fb6d4dc47a07e5782494b6defc89a194b1f906/traversal.go#L23

github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery - library that provides a convenient and concise way to query HTML and XML documents. It provides a jQuery-like API for selecting elements and extracting data, making it a popular choice for web scraping in Go.

Yep, I thing I can add it. Add new goquery alternative will be good :)

If I want to parse the structure of HTML and not interact with it from a browser point of view, I use this in Go: https://github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery

goquery

I had a similar problem that I solved with goquery and otto. You can use goquery to traverse the DOM and otto to execute the script fragment. Then just grab the data from otto's VM.

Your scraping being slow and using Chrome might be a blessing in disguise though. If you aren't careful you can get detected as a bot and banned from the site.

https://github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery

If you're willing to add constraints around the goal, you can catch this type of error with semgrep rules and/or unit tests using qoquery.

RUN go get github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery

I would suggest https://github.com/antchfx/htmlquery instead. It would basically give you access to the same sort of things you'd run in the browser for this case, only without a browser. At least as long as we're taking static HTML generation.

htmlquery