SVT-AV1 VS caniuse

The docs mention that the unit for this option is in "frames" (not "seconds").

From the pull request:

In these tests SVT-AV1 beats x265 on quality:

- FullHD: http://compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/2022/main_repor...

- FullHD 10-bit: http://compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/2022/10_bit_rep...

- 4K: http://compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/2022/4k_report....

SVT-AV1 has seen a number of speed ups in recent releases:

https://gitlab.com/AOMediaCodec/SVT-AV1/-/releases

I don't see this options under the "Advanced features" like for H.265/HEVC (for example). Also, adding "-input-depth 10" manually to the command line doesn't work (it doesn't recognize the parameter, despite it clearly being written here as one of them).

Docs for SVT-AV1 at https://gitlab.com/AOMediaCodec/SVT-AV1/-/tree/master/Docs

I find it interesting that you know the project well enough to get to the pre-compiled binaries page, yet somehow missed that the merge request explictly calls out a VMAF LOSS for the SSIM tune by several percentage points.

SVT-AV1 has no NEON.

I used the precompiled FFmpeg from SVT-AV1's git: https://gitlab.com/AOMediaCodec/SVT-AV1/-/jobs/4540276837

You forgot to mention (Web)Workers. This is explicit creation, management, and communication with additional threads within JavaScript. What's more, they've been around in JavaScript longer than the V8 engine has even existed!

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Workers...

https://caniuse.com/?search=webworkers

Do you happen to know where can I check out the cutoff version for each browser? https://caniuse.com/?search=wasm doesn't have it (or other things like WasmGC for that matter)

(https://caniuse.com/) A handy tool for checking the browser compatibility of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript features. Can I Use provides up-to-date support tables for various web technologies across different browsers.

Caniuse

Can I Use (https://caniuse.com/)

> Is it though?

In my experience it's the buggiest browser out of the big three, and is often missing basic features like e.g.:

https://caniuse.com/?search=opus

Supported in Firefox for *12 years* now, in Chrome for 10, still no support in Safari.

They only "support" Opus audio in their special snowflake '.caf' container, which is super buggy and the last time I checked no open source program could even generate Opus '.caf' files that could be played by Safari on all Apple platforms. I ended up writing a custom converter which takes a standard '.opus' file and remuxes it on-the-fly (I only store '.opus' files on my server) into Safari-compatible '.caf' files, taking special care to massage it so that it avoids all of their demuxer/decoder bugs. You shouldn't have to do this to have cross-browser high quality audio!

Well I'll be! In my mind I had this clear picture of Firefox implementing it.

It correct, it was only Chrome: https://caniuse.com/?search=html%20import

https://caniuse.com/?search=web%20bluetooth

which might be great because you have the choice...

and you can use open source chromium or brave (like the jvm to run cross platform java) to run web apps seemlessly that need web bluetooth or such but use safari or firefox for personal use if you find them more secure

I mean using chromium engine as the running environment where chromium only ever runs special trusted web domains and never goes to other "malicious" web domains that may fuck up iOS as Apple claims would be still a secure choice

like you will not download spyware from Apple Store because you are an adult not because Apple can protect you there