Gitbucket
woodpecker
Our great sponsors
Gitbucket | woodpecker | |
---|---|---|
12 | 54 | |
9,060 | 3,651 | |
0.2% | 3.7% | |
9.2 | 9.9 | |
7 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Scala | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Gitbucket
-
Anyway to build my own github server at home for private use? I have hundreds of apps and want to keep them private
Gitbucket (https://gitbucket.github.io/)
-
code snippets - what do you use?
GitBucket
-
An Open Source apps Leads to XSS to RCE Vulnerability Flaws
Link: https://github.com/gitbucket/gitbucket
-
GitHub incident 2022-03-23
Another self-hosted project in the space that i've seen was GitBucket, although it runs on the JVM (not necessarily a bad thing, just different from Go): https://gitbucket.github.io/
-
Python For Everyone: Mastering Python The Right Way
Version control Systems eg. Github, Bitbucket, Gitbucket help in version control of your code and generally storage of your code. It can also serve as a visual reminder of the progress you make eg. on Github there is a monitoring system that shows how many days you are active on the platform.
-
GitHub Down again 11/27/2021
> Git itself decentralizes source control, and yet we all want to use single-point-of-failure Github.
This is pretty much why both the organization that i work for, as well as i personally for my homelab use self-hosted GitLab instances: https://about.gitlab.com/
Though in practice there are a lot of other options out there, like Gitea (https://gitea.com/) and GitBucket (https://gitbucket.github.io/), though maybe less so for alternative source control systems (e.g. SVN has been all forgotten, however that's a personal pet peeve).
Not only that, but i also utilize my own Sonatype Nexus (https://www.sonatype.com/products/repository-oss?topnav=true) instances to great success: for doing everything from mirroring container images that i need from DockerHub (e.g. due to their proposed removal policies for old images and already adopted rate limits), to mirroring Maven/npm/NuGet/pip/Ruby and other dependencies, so i don't have to connect to things on the Internet whenever i want to do a new build.
That not only improves resiliency against things on the Internet going down (apart from situations where i need something new and it's not yet cached), but also improves performance a lot in practice, when only the company servers need to be hit, or my own personal servers in the data center for my cloud hosted stuff, or my own personal servers in my homelab for my own stuff.
Admittedly, all of that takes a bit of setup, especially if you happen to expose anything to the web in a zero trust fashion (permissible for my own stuff, as long as i'm okay with manually managing CVEs just to probably get hacked in the end anyways, but definitely not that any corporation with an internal network would want to do), but in my eyes that's still worth the effort, if you value being in control of your own software stack and the ecosystem around it.
It's probably much less worth it, if you don't see that as a benefit and don't want to be the one responsible for whatever project you're working on getting hacked, e.g. if you'd fail to patch out the recent GitLab CVE where exiftools could execute arbitrary code, which is probably the case if you don't have the resources to constantly throw at maintenance, in comparison to companies with 100x - 1000x more resources than you have for that sort of stuff.
-
How to build a search engine with Ruby on Rails
> Rails doesn't scale? Github's the largest code repository site in the world.
You know, i think i understand both of the viewpoints here. Personally, i'd say that Rails doesn't scale as well as i'd expect it to. You can definitely build scalable systems in it, though you'll end up throwing a whole bunch of hardware resources, when compared to certain other languages and technology stacks, to serve similar load.
For example, right now i self-host a GitLab (https://about.gitlab.com/) instance for managing my code repositories, CI builds and so on. Even with just me using it (alongside some automated processes), it routinely eats up close to 4 GB of RAM, which in my case is an entire VPSes worth and costs me about 60 Euros a year with Time4VPS (affiliate link, if you'd like to check it out: https://www.time4vps.com/?affid=5294) but would cost me way more in AWS, GCP etc. One could argue that that's not too expensive, but not everyone earns a lot of money and running 10-20 VPSes does eventually build up, since i can't afford colocation and my residential homelab setup with a WireGuard tunnel to bypass ISP NAT with a proxy VPS is pretty slow, even if i can afford more storage, RAM and CPU power that way.
Compare that situation to projects like Gogs (https://gogs.io/), Gitea (https://gitea.com/), GitBucket (https://gitbucket.github.io/) and sourcehut (https://sourcehut.org/) - i'd argue that all of them on average use less CPU resources and memory for accomplishing similar tasks. For example, have a look here: https://forgeperf.org/
However, we cannot ignore the fact that using Ruby might have been exactly what allowed for quickly creating the functionality of GitLab and many other platforms and tools out there, GitHub included, so the choice between usable software and innovation in the near future and performant software possibly years from now is a tricky one.
There are probably good arguments for both, but noone can declare either to be better. Personally, i don't mind using Ruby, Python or even PHP when it makes sense and i don't need to worry about scalability from day 0.
-
Selfhosted open source alternative to GitHub/GitLab
I saw this on HN and have been using it for the past two weeks for some small hobby projects. The docs are so-so but I got it set up in Docker without much hassle. I've since migrated completely from gitbucket. Great software - I encourage everyone to try it out.
-
Scala projects to read through
A Git platform (like github or gitlab) written in Scala. Definitely not a pet project so might be fun to read the code. https://github.com/gitbucket/gitbucket
- Gitly: A light and fast GitHub/Gitlab alternative written in V lang (pre-alpha)
woodpecker
- The worst thing about Jenkins is that it works
-
Examples of Woodpecker (CI/CD) pipelines for .NET
Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.
-
regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers
Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker
-
GitHub: “Human eyes” will never see the contents of your private repositories
> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline
I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/
Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/
I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...
- Woodpecker CI: simple, extensible CI engine powered by Docker
-
What self-hosted Git server ?
https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io
-
GitHub actions top alternatives
https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/
-
Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].
I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].
-
JSON vs XML
The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/
- Woodpecker
What are some alternatives?
Gitea - Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
drone - Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/gitness]
Gogs - Gogs is a painless self-hosted Git service
Jenkins - Jenkins automation server
Taiga - Agile project management platform. Built on top of Django and AngularJS
gitlab-runner
Gitlab CI - GitLab CE Mirror | Please open new issues in our issue tracker on GitLab.com
github-act-runner - act as self-hosted runner
Taiga-front - [DEPRECATED] Project management web application with scrum in mind! Build on top of Django and AngularJS (Frontend Code)
Concourse - Concourse is a container-based continuous thing-doer written in Go.
Scoverage - Scoverage Scala Code Coverage Core Libs
onedev - Git Server with CI/CD, Kanban, and Packages. Seamless integration. Unparalleled experience.