git-crypt
up
Our great sponsors
git-crypt | up | |
---|---|---|
50 | 25 | |
7,955 | 8,128 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
3 months ago | 7 months ago | |
C++ | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
git-crypt
-
Why Can't My Mom Email Me?
https://github.com/AGWA/git-crypt
And occasionally to encrypt files, or receive encrypted files.
These are practical things which are non-theoretical.
> Using multiple keys don't offer added security or secrecy.
Depends on how careful you are or want to be, with your private key. My house key isn't the same as my car key isn't the same as my bike key.
> This is nothing like data harvesting
Alright fair, bad example. What I was grumbling about was more the lack of any clear communication that you've been auto-opted-in to a feature on protonmail, with no user interface signal indicating so, leading to confusion for a couple months like in TFA. I definitely wasn't casting shade on the opengpg keyserver, nor protonmail. It's the "hey! I didn't check a box for this, and it's not mentioned anywhere in the protonmail docs" hidden functionality which could do with some clarification.
I'm a forgetful creature. If I intentionally put my key on a keyserver, because I'm playing around and learning about PGP, will I make the connection between it and protonmail a few months down the line if I move my email account to them? Unlikely.
It's a nice automated feature. Protonmail-to-protonmail e2e encryption makes a lot of sense. I just think protonmail-to-non-protonmail e2e needs a tooltip in the UI, and the option to opt out, potentially with the ability to opt out for specific email addresses. I wouldn't at all assume it would be on by default even IF I've been actively using PGP in my email clients, because it's something you usually have to manually set up yourself, very explicitly. That, and 99.9% of emails are plaintext.
Anyhoo, one thing I forgot which kind of negates the "what if I have multiple encryption keys tied to my email" is the fact that the opengpg keyserver does tie 1 email address to 1 key so you can't publish multiple encryption keys, fair enough. Git-crypt and file encryption, I set my associated email address to use +tags eg [email protected], so as far as protonmail etc are concerned there's only one key per logical email address.
-
Is it safe to commit a Terraform file to GitHub?
Apart from a few exceptions (like ansible for example, which supports native encryption), we moved away from encrypted secrets in git repos and use external things, depending on the platform (like parameter store / secrets manager for AWS or keyvault for Azure - both of these do track changes, btw), so I haven't looked for quite a while. Back in ye olden days we used https://github.com/AGWA/git-crypt which worked quite nicely, but the key management is cumbersome and it's based on GPG, which in itself is a bit of a light redish flag these days.
-
GitHub Private Repos Considered Private-Ish
How about encryption?
https://github.com/AGWA/git-crypt has been solid for me
-
Codeship jet alternative
You might want to check out git-crypt. It allows you to encrypt and decrypt files in a git repo without needing an external account, and supports .env files. That said, trying your hand at making one as a personal project could be a fun and rewarding experience!
-
Ask HN: Privacy-Conscious GitHub?
I hesitate to append this but one option I have seen thrown around and also debated is git-crypt [1] There are many caveats to doing this as any integrations that would need to read the file contents would also need to be able to decrypt the files so this may not be entirely useful and may add many levels of complexity and fragility.
-
Vaults vs. Cryptomator? Security, Cloud syncing, integration?
The most interesting approach I've seen for this is https://github.com/AGWA/git-crypt
-
How can I Make this binary statically-linked?
Here is the Makefile.
I use git-crypt to encrypt files in git repositories quite a lot and I find that it doesn't work on RHEL-based distros because of some missing or out-of-date library. I need to build a statically linked binary.
-
How to Deploy and Scale Strapi on a Kubernetes Cluster 1/2
Store the Secrets in a repo using gitcrypt or another encryption tool.
-
I moved all my input files to a private repo and used it as a submodule
Consider using git-crypt for transparent encryption instead.
up
-
Fx – Terminal JSON Viewer
This fx rewrite is very exciting. I'll have to try it. I thought of fx as a wrapper around jq, that allowed quick iteration over building jq scripts. Sort of an Ultimate Plumber [1] but only for jq. It looks like it is now more like a JavaScript processor plus an interactive viewer.
Someone mention Visidata[2]? VisiData is also a TUI that is great on tabular data, and it can work with json. If your JSON is mostly tabular in nature, Visidata does a great job at showing that data and allowing you to explore it. A lot of json I deal with is tabular-like data. There is a great tutorial [3], that can help you get your bearings with Visidata. Once you understand those basics you might want to look at this thread [4] for what commands you can use with json.
[1] Ultimate Plumber: https://github.com/akavel/up
- Up: Plumber is a tool for writing Linux pipes with instant live preview
-
Show HN: LineSelect, shell utility to interactively select lines in a pipeline
Ultimate plumber can do this.
- Ultimate Plumber – a tool for writing Linux pipes with live preview
-
`jqp`, a TUI playground for `jq`
Been using up for years but this looks nice too
-
An interactive wrapper around `jq`
Fun. But I can achieve the same result (I think) with ultimate plumber and regular jq, but without being restricted just to jq. Feel free to correct me.
-
What are some useful cli tools that arent popular?
Up - The Ultimate Plumber makes the best pipes !
-
A list of new(ish) command line tools – Julia Evans
As an alternative allowing the use of any shell command/pipeline on the results interactively, see also: https://github.com/akavel/up
- RegExr: Learn, Build and Test Regex
-
Is there any command-line application that you wish existed but doesn't (or isn't as good as you wished)?
Would https://github.com/akavel/up solve your problem?
What are some alternatives?
git-secrets - Commit files with sensitive information like environment secrets safely encrypted in GitHub
nvim-jqx - Populate the quickfix with json entries
sops - Simple and flexible tool for managing secrets
dive - A tool for exploring each layer in a docker image
sealed-secrets - A Kubernetes controller and tool for one-way encrypted Secrets
zsh-history-substring-search - 🐠 ZSH port of Fish history search (up arrow)
age - A simple, modern and secure encryption tool (and Go library) with small explicit keys, no config options, and UNIX-style composability.
fx - Terminal JSON viewer & processor
dendron - The personal knowledge management (PKM) tool that grows as you do!
fzf-tab - Replace zsh's default completion selection menu with fzf!
helm-secrets - A helm plugin that help manage secrets with Git workflow and store them anywhere
hurl - Hurl, run and test HTTP requests with plain text.