git-cola VS tortoisegit

Compare git-cola vs tortoisegit and see what are their differences.

tortoisegit

Windows Explorer Extension to Operate Git; Mirror of official repository https://tortoisegit.org/sourcecode (by tortoisegit)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
git-cola tortoisegit
15 35
2,185 1,372
1.3% 1.8%
9.6 9.4
6 days ago 3 days ago
Python C++
GNU General Public License v3.0 only GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

git-cola

Posts with mentions or reviews of git-cola. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-10.
  • Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?
    17 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Dec 2023
    > Visual Studio does a decent job of abstracting the GIT nuances, but I personally use GIT Extensions, which looks and feels much better on Windows than the other cross platform UIs.

    IDEs and text editors sometimes have nice Git integrations in the UI, but I wanted standalone software that I can use for anything from various programming projects, to something like gamedev projects (with Git LFS) or arbitrary documents.

    In the end, I just forked over some money for GitKraken, it's pretty good, especially with multiple accounts on the same platforms, when you want to switch between them easily: https://www.gitkraken.com/

    There's also Sourcetree which I used before then, kind of sluggish but feature complete: https://www.sourcetreeapp.com/

    For something more lightweight, I also enjoyed Git Cola on various OSes: https://git-cola.github.io/ Even Git documentation has a page on the software out there, a good deal of which is free and has good platform support: https://git-scm.com/downloads/guis

    Quite frankly, I spend like 90% of the time using a GUI interface nowadays, when I want to easily merge things, or include very specific code blocks across multiple files in a commit, or handle most of the other common operations. Of course, sometimes there's a need to drop down to the CLI, but you're right that some GUI software feels like it actually improves the usability here.

  • I don't know why so many devs avoid a GUI for Git
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Nov 2023
  • Why Git Is Hard
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Oct 2023
    I think Git can be a pretty pleasant experience for most folks, as long as you use the basic features and maybe even consider a GUI, anything from Git Cola (free: https://git-cola.github.io/), to something like GitKraken (paid for all features: https://www.gitkraken.com/).

    Curiously, the latter also let me setup different accounts that I can switch between with a simple dropdown, which was otherwise annoying when you have Gitea, GitHub, GitLab and others to manage, way easier than https://docs.github.com/en/account-and-profile/setting-up-an...

    Either way, suddenly you see the graph of your repo and most of the common actions are a click away, you can just let your brain idle and think about other things you're doing instead, in addition to that working really well with staging chunks of your code, or individual files, cherrypicking and so on.

    Then again, personally I prefer squashing in merge/pull requests instead of rebasing, or even just doing regular merge commits and leaving the history as is (which doesn't really scale, but I haven't gotten to the point where that matters that much), so how I use Git won't work for everyone.

  • Top 10 Git GUI Clients for Linux in 2023
    5 projects | /r/git | 11 May 2023
  • Exploring the Top 10 Git GUI Clients for Linux in 2023
    5 projects | /r/linux | 10 May 2023
  • Git-SIM: Visually simulate Git operations in your own repos with a single termi
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Jan 2023
    > We now have a large selection of tools that allow you to visualize what's going on (I use git-kraken), as well as google for help on doing something that isn't in muscle memory.

    Git Kraken is excellent, though Git has a page on various GUIs, many of which are free with no restrictions: https://git-scm.com/downloads/guis

    Personally, on Windows I like SourceTree: https://www.sourcetreeapp.com/

    Some that have worked with SVN back in the day like TortoiseGit: https://tortoisegit.org/

    On *nix Git Cola seems to do the job for me: https://git-cola.github.io/

    Then again, the most complex workflow I've worked with was Git Flow and I didn't need anything more advanced than that. Come to think of it, I don't really do rebases often either and mostly just take advantage of squashing commits through GitLab/Gitea and such, when needed.

    But hey, that's also valid, using Git in a way where you get version control but mostly keep the technical details out of your way (though Git LFS and certain cases with particular line endings being needed does make you drop down occasionally).

  • Report: More Developers Use Linux Than a Mac
    5 projects | /r/linux | 27 Dec 2022
    Try git cola. It's not the slickest but it scratches my pointy/clicky desires for git pretty well.
  • How can I find someone to explain
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Dec 2022
  • Idiot Proof Git
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Nov 2022
    If you can tolerate a GUI, Git Cola might be a solution. I'm using it exclusively for some 5 years now – it's lightweight enough, but still makes you think about what you're about to commit. You can add things to .gitignore directly from there, too.

    https://git-cola.github.io/

    Default layout is pretty barebones, here's what I'm doing instead: https://u.ale.sh/my-git-cola-screenshot.png

  • I think the real reason why people think using the terminal is required on Linux is a direct result of the Linux terminal being so much better than the Windows terminal
    5 projects | /r/linux | 28 Jul 2022
    i still don't know how to split one commit into multiples (without going insane (if it's even possible)) without a gui like https://github.com/git-cola/git-cola, and that should be a simple operation (especially with git's "split every change into individual commits make it easier to cherry pick" conventions)

tortoisegit

Posts with mentions or reviews of tortoisegit. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-29.
  • I don't know why so many devs avoid a GUI for Git
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Nov 2023
  • Turtle – Git Client for Gnome
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 18 Aug 2023
    There is also a TortoiseGit that is based on TortoiseSVN

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TortoiseGit

    https://tortoisegit.org/

  • Suggestions for portfolio projects.
    2 projects | /r/embedded | 29 Apr 2023
    TortoiseGit sourcetree git kraken some times you need to compare to files you can do this with the notpad++ compare plugin or with Meld
  • GIT GUI tool or command line?
    6 projects | /r/webdev | 21 Apr 2023
    Instead on my PC I use TortoiseGit. Most useful for the git log (as a graph), diff with previous versions,, filter files to commit by directory and ability to exclude files from the current commit, and most of all; ease of splitting a commit for each single file into parts by ability to "restore after commit" which allows you to edit a file before the commit and have it automatically restored to the pre-commit state afterwards.
  • Tortoise SVN to Git. Windows Integration Context Menu?
    1 project | /r/github | 20 Feb 2023
  • TexStudio - git integration for easy committing?
    5 projects | /r/LaTeX | 20 Feb 2023
    If running TeXStudio in Windows, my personal preference is to keep the automatic check-in disabled and to use the manual one (File -> SVN/git -> Check in); this allows an individual commit message with the briefer abstract line, empty line, and the longer report. Perhaps it is less exhaustive then a proper git client (in Windows e.g., tortoise), yet TeXStudio' GUI and integrated version control allows to resolve many typical situations. The developers document as advanced use; heck, after some time, it becomes second nature. In case of missing git-related functionality, you still can opt for an other git GUI or for git from the command line independent of TeXStudio's choice.
  • Git-SIM: Visually simulate Git operations in your own repos with a single termi
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Jan 2023
    > We now have a large selection of tools that allow you to visualize what's going on (I use git-kraken), as well as google for help on doing something that isn't in muscle memory.

    Git Kraken is excellent, though Git has a page on various GUIs, many of which are free with no restrictions: https://git-scm.com/downloads/guis

    Personally, on Windows I like SourceTree: https://www.sourcetreeapp.com/

    Some that have worked with SVN back in the day like TortoiseGit: https://tortoisegit.org/

    On *nix Git Cola seems to do the job for me: https://git-cola.github.io/

    Then again, the most complex workflow I've worked with was Git Flow and I didn't need anything more advanced than that. Come to think of it, I don't really do rebases often either and mostly just take advantage of squashing commits through GitLab/Gitea and such, when needed.

    But hey, that's also valid, using Git in a way where you get version control but mostly keep the technical details out of your way (though Git LFS and certain cases with particular line endings being needed does make you drop down occasionally).

  • Committing to repositories
    1 project | /r/github | 12 Jan 2023
    The method to add the illustration to git, either from the command line, or via a GUI (for example TortoiseGit) should not have an influence how the image is managed by git itself. There is no "watermark" like stamp on the picture from which you later could tell if the picture, or the edit on the picture was committed from the CLI, or e.g., tortoise, either.
  • Noob question: Does anyone use things like git gui?
    2 projects | /r/git | 7 Jan 2023
    I started with TortoiseGit (coming from TortoiseSVN), then used SourceTree for a while (until Atlassian broke it. I hear it is better now), but I’ve settled in GitKraken for my work stuff where I need to maintain full histories while ping-ponging code features between many branches. I’ve heard great things about GitTower too.
  • How can I find someone to explain
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Dec 2022

What are some alternatives?

When comparing git-cola and tortoisegit you can also consider the following projects:

VCS - This is my first simple version control system

GitExtensions - Git Extensions is a standalone UI tool for managing git repositories. It also integrates with Windows Explorer and Microsoft Visual Studio (2015/2017/2019).

Guitar - Git GUI Client

cz-cli - The commitizen command line utility. #BlackLivesMatter

GitUp - The Git interface you've been missing all your life has finally arrived.

Cryptomator - Multi-platform transparent client-side encryption of your files in the cloud

VirtScreen - Make your iPad/tablet/computer into a secondary monitor on Linux.

vscode-git-graph - View a Git Graph of your repository in Visual Studio Code, and easily perform Git actions from the graph.

django-markdownx - Comprehensive Markdown plugin built for Django

intellij-community - IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition & IntelliJ Platform

webdiff - Two-column web-based git difftool

lazygit - simple terminal UI for git commands