gensim VS xgboost

This is our optimization problem. Now, we hope that you have an idea of what our goal is. Luckily for us, this is already implemented in a Python module called gensim. Yes, these guys are brilliant in natural language processing and we will make use of it. 🤝

Try LDA as implemented in gemsin https://github.com/RaRe-Technologies/gensim

Standout python NLP libraries include Spacy and Gensim, as well as pre-trained model availability in Hugginface. These libraries have widespread use in and support from industry and it shows. Spacy has best-in-class methods for pre-processing text for further applications. Gensim helps you manage your corpus of documents, and contains a lot of different tools for solving a common industry task, topic modeling.

Here we have to install the gensim library in a jupyter notebook to be able to use it in our project, consider the code below;

Nice work! I wonder if you're going the same challenges that gensim had for being generic in summarization.

For context:

> Despite its general-sounding name, the module will not satisfy the majority of use cases in production and is likely to waste people's time.

https://github.com/RaRe-Technologies/gensim/wiki/Migrating-f...

TextRank will work without any problems. https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/

For the topic modelling itself, I am going to use Gensim library by Radim Rehurek, which is very developer friendly and easy to use.

Finally, when it comes to building models and making predictions, Python and R have a plethora of options available. Libraries like scikit-learn, statsmodels, and TensorFlowin Python, or caret, randomForest, and xgboostin R, provide powerful machine learning algorithms and statistical models that can be applied to a wide range of problems. What's more, these libraries are open-source and have extensive documentation and community support, making it easy to learn and apply new techniques without needing specialized training or expensive software licenses.

You can find the problem outlined here: https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost/issues/5826. u/hcho3 diagnosed the problem and corrected it as of XGB version 1.2.0.

Reference: https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost/issues/2031

By the way, most of the time XGBoost works just as well for projects, would not recommend applying deep learning to every single problem you come across, it's something Stanford CS really likes to showcase when it's well known (1) that sometimes "smaller"/less complex models can perform just as well or have their own interpretive advantages and (2) it is well known within ML and DS communities that deep learning does not perform as well with tabular datasets and using deep learning as a default to every problem is just poor practice. However, if you do (god forbid) get language, speech/audio, vision/imaging, or even time series models then deep learning as a baseline is not the worst idea.