gcsfuse
MooseFS
Our great sponsors
| gcsfuse | MooseFS | |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | 3 | |
| 1,976 | 1,583 | |
| 1.5% | 2.0% | |
| 9.7 | 4.8 | |
| about 22 hours ago | about 2 months ago | |
| Go | C | |
| Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gcsfuse
-
Gcsfuse: A user-space file system for interacting with Google Cloud Storage
It uses FUSE and there's three types of Kernel cache you could use with FUSE (although, it seems like gcsfuse is exposing only one):
1. Cache of file attributes in the Kernel (this is controlled by "stat-cache-ttl" value - https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcsfuse/blob/7dc5c7ff...)
-
Does Cloud file store have life cycle management feature ?
You're looking at Filestore because your software can only write to a mounted file system? If so, you could mount a Google Cloud Storage bucket with Fuse. I haven't used Fuse myself in production, but it may be worth trying out for your workload.
-
Google Cloud Storage FUSE
Is this the same gcsfuse that's been around for years, only now with official Google support?
- Suggestions on data transfer between VM instances
-
RANT: MICROSOFT'S INABILITY TO SUPPORT THEIR OWN HARDWARE IS GOING TO KILL ME
I'm pretty sure the storage for a stopped VM vs a disk image will be the same. Cheaper if you can store your data in GCS bucket? Take a look at GCS-Fuse to mount storage buckets into a VM.
-
Ongoing Incident in Google Cloud
Currently being tracked here: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcsfuse/issues/961
MooseFS
- Google Cloud Storage FUSE
-
Garage, our self-hosted distributed object storage solution
MooseFS is designed for large files and can have a global goal of 1 copy (no replication)
-
Can someone tell me if this is possible or even a good idea?
My friends and I all use Linux and often use each others laptops or desktops when we forget ours. Then I had the idea to install Linux on a USB so I could have all my stuff and use my system on any system. Which was cool but then I ran into the same problem of forgetting it sometimes. So my new idea (which I have no idea how I'd achieve) is to use something like MooseFS or ceph or some distributed filesystem for our home partition. So then we can just login and have all our files and customization's be there almost seamlessly. I don't know how or if it would work but it seems like it could. What do you think?
What are some alternatives?
google-drive-ocamlfuse - FUSE filesystem over Google Drive
Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform
goofys - a high-performance, POSIX-ish Amazon S3 file system written in Go
lizardfs - LizardFS is an Open Source Distributed File System licensed under GPLv3.
juicefs - JuiceFS is a distributed POSIX file system built on top of Redis and S3.
GlusterFS - Web Content for gluster.org -- Deprecated as of September 2017
afero - A FileSystem Abstraction System for Go
Seaweed File System - SeaweedFS is a fast distributed storage system for blobs, objects, files, and data lake, for billions of files! Blob store has O(1) disk seek, cloud tiering. Filer supports Cloud Drive, cross-DC active-active replication, Kubernetes, POSIX FUSE mount, S3 API, S3 Gateway, Hadoop, WebDAV, encryption, Erasure Coding. [Moved to: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs]
fsnotify - Cross-platform file system notifications for Go.
Apache Hadoop - Apache Hadoop
go-systemd - Go bindings to systemd socket activation, journal, D-Bus, and unit files
GlusterFS - Gluster Filesystem : Build your distributed storage in minutes