FuseBox VS webpack

Compare FuseBox vs webpack and see what are their differences.

FuseBox

A blazing fast js bundler/loader with a comprehensive API :fire: (by fuse-box)

webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows for loading parts of the application on demand. Through "loaders", modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff. (by webpack)
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
FuseBox webpack
3 328
4,029 64,069
- 0.3%
3.9 9.8
over 1 year ago 3 days ago
JavaScript JavaScript
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

FuseBox

Posts with mentions or reviews of FuseBox. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-16.
  • Building a Webpack alternative in F#
    14 projects | dev.to | 16 Dec 2021
    At the time I had been exploring alternatives to Webpack like fuse-box, parcel, and esbuild. Around the same time I was made aware aware that browsers had already implemented [ESM modules], so technically as long as you produced HTML, CSS, and JS you didn't need any kind of pre-processing at all.
  • AMP CMS: Dashboard
    2 projects | dev.to | 17 Feb 2021
    For this project, I've decided to give fuse-box a try and loved it. It's a very fast web bundler based on TypeScript. The only drawback was to install node-sass instead of the dart sass version I already have. Oh, well, it's just one useless module.

webpack

Posts with mentions or reviews of webpack. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-25.
  • Creating Nx Workspace with Eslint, Prettier and Husky Configuration
    12 projects | dev.to | 25 Mar 2024
  • Google: Angular and Wiz Are Merging
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 21 Mar 2024
    Thanks for the thorough answer!

    I confess I wasn't thinking about a particular build tool. My recent experience has been with Vite, where I took a similar approach to what you describe, but haven't had to dig deep into bundle performance because that's not a bottleneck for our application. The last time I did deeper work on the subject was years ago with Webpack.

    I thought Webpack at least did dead-code elimination before splitting things into chunks. If I'm reading this random GitHub issue[1] right (and the asker is also right), Webpack does partially behave as I expected, but the pre-chunking optimization pass occurs before things like constant expression evaluation.

    [1] https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/16672

  • JS Toolbox 2024: Bundlers and Test Frameworks
    10 projects | dev.to | 3 Mar 2024
    Webpack is a powerful and widely-used module bundler for JavaScript applications. It’s known for its flexibility and extensive plugin system, making it a popular tool in complex web development projects.
  • Webpack: The Web Module Bundler
    2 projects | dev.to | 2 Mar 2024
    Step 4: Now, we need to install two packages that is webpack and webpack-cli In Terminal, run the below command for installing this packages.
    2 projects | dev.to | 2 Mar 2024
    Thats all about Webpack Basic, there are lots of feature of webpack, You can check here: https://webpack.js.org/
  • How to improve page load speed and response times: A comprehensive guide
    8 projects | dev.to | 26 Feb 2024
    Many web pages use CSS and JavaScript files to handle various features and styles. Each file, however, requires a separate HTTP request, which can slow down page loading. Concatenation comes into play here. It involves combining multiple CSS or JavaScript files into a single file. As a result, pages load faster, reducing the time spent requesting individual files. Gulp, Grunt, and Webpack are some of the tools that can assist you in speeding up the concatenation process. They enable seamless merging of many files during development, ensuring deployment readiness.
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    11 projects | dev.to | 25 Feb 2024
    Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them. Bun is vying for the spot of The New Hotness in bundling, Rome has been forked into Biome, and Vercel is building a Rust-based Webpack alternative.
  • Top 20 Frontend Interview Questions With Answers
    7 projects | dev.to | 3 Feb 2024
    Webpack is a module bundler, the main purpose of which is to bundle JavaScript files to make them usable in a browser.
  • A step-by-step guide: How to create and publish an NPM package.
    6 projects | dev.to | 2 Feb 2024
    NPM packages include a wide range of tools such as frameworks like Express or React, libraries like jQuery, and task runners such as Gulp, and Webpack.
  • 🔥 FAST & FURIOUS WEBSITE 2024 🔥Tips & Links for performance optimization
    2 projects | dev.to | 22 Jan 2024
    Another way to optimize is by reducing the size of CSS, JavaScript, and HTML files by removing comments, unnecessary spaces, and line breaks. Combine CSS and JavaScript files into a single file to reduce the number of server requests. This can be done using build tools like Webpack or Gulp.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FuseBox and webpack you can also consider the following projects:

craco - Create React App Configuration Override, an easy and comprehensible configuration layer for Create React App.

esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web

vite - Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!

Rollup - Next-generation ES module bundler

parcel - The zero configuration build tool for the web. 📦🚀

gulp - A toolkit to automate & enhance your workflow

react-app-rewired - Override create-react-app webpack configs without ejecting

tsup - The simplest and fastest way to bundle your TypeScript libraries.

Snowpack - ESM-powered frontend build tool. Instant, lightweight, unbundled development. ✌️ [Moved to: https://github.com/FredKSchott/snowpack]

lerna - :dragon: Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository.

importmap-rails - Use ESM with importmap to manage modern JavaScript in Rails without transpiling or bundling.

Microbundle - 📦 Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules.