fs-components VS elmish

The source code for this post is here: https://github.com/AngelMunoz/fs-components

For those interested in .NET languages with alternative compilation targets, Elmish (https://elmish.github.io/elmish/) is pretty unique.

We use F# on the front end (instead of TS), and thanks to the Fable compiler (which transpiles F# to JS, Python, Dart, PHP and Rust), most of the benefits of an Elm-style model in the UI can be ported to all sorts of different outputs languages. The rust target is in beta, but its promising because the WASM bundle size stands to be dramatically lower.

While the default is reactivity library for Elmish is React, you can swap in Avalonia/FuncUI (https://github.com/fsprojects/Avalonia.FuncUI) pretty easily as well.

Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.

Since you're familiar with React + Reframe, you can try Elmish! You can use F# to write [Elmish](https://elmish.github.io/elmish/) apps. It takes the Elm approach to building apps.

Who’s paying for this? https://github.com/elmish/elmish

Try F# with Elmish.

Maybe elmish could be of interest to you? https://github.com/elmish/elmish

I never tried Elm directly, but I have used the F# equivalent Elmish - super productive idea.

You can also get nested templates, bind inputs, and radios for example by the way don't be scared by the mutable keyword right there is just to show a brief example in a normal situation you would likely be using Elmish

Comet promotes a variation of the Model-View-Update pattern popularized by The Elm Architecture, Elmish, Fabulous and others. The major parts of MVU are: