fragnix
ocaml

fragnix | ocaml | |
---|---|---|
6 | 129 | |
126 | 5,620 | |
-0.8% | 1.1% | |
0.0 | 9.9 | |
almost 4 years ago | 3 days ago | |
Haskell | OCaml | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fragnix
-
Is package management / dependency management a solved problem?
Yes. The solution is called "fragment-based code distribution". I've experimented with it in fragnix and Unison has it ready-to-use.
-
Bloat
A long time ago I experimented with fragment-based code distribution. The idea is that the unit of distribution should be individual functions and not packages. The Unison language does this in practice.
-
Lazy Build System
See fragnix.
- Fragnix: Fragment Based Package Manager
-
Content-addressed GHC?
There's been attempts and https://github.com/fragnix/fragnix deserves mentioning here
-
Idea for reducing build time
A project called fragnix which splits all modules into single-function modules. That way only the parts that you use will be compiled.
ocaml
-
Hedy: Textual Programming Made Easy
Most recent I remember was in 2011: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/5419
- OCaml 5.3 Released
- Non-temporal store heuristics on the Apple M2
-
TypeScript's Lack of Naming Types and Type Conversion in Angular
Elm, ReScript, F#, Ocaml, Scala… it’s just normal to name your types, then use them places. In fact, you’ll often create the types _before_ the code, even if you’re not really practicing DDD (Domain Driven Design). Yes, you’ll do many after the fact when doing functions, or you start testing things and decide to change your design, and make new types. Either way, it’s just “the norm”. You then do the other norms like “name your function” and “name your variables”. I’m a bit confused why it’s only 2 out of 3 (variables and functions, not types) in this TypeScript Angular project. I’ll have to look at other internal Angular projects and see if it’s common there as well.
-
Whence '\N'?
It does, it links to this: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/4d6ecfb5cf4a5da814784dee...
-
My first experience with OCaml
open Monitoring let test_get_websites_from_file () = let websites = Config.get_websites_from_file "test_websites.yaml" in assert (List.length websites = 2); let first = List.hd websites in assert (first.url = "https://ocaml.org"); assert (first.interval = 20) let () = Unix.chdir "../../../test/"; test_get_websites_from_file ();
- My first experience with Gleam Language
-
ReScript has come a long way, maybe it's time to switch from TypeScript?
Ocaml is still a wonderful language if you want to look into it, and Reason is still going strong as an alternate syntax for OCaml. With either OCaml or Reason you can compile to native code, or use the continuation of BuckleScript now called Melange.
What are some alternatives?
zeus
dune - A composable build system for OCaml.
cmarkit - CommonMark parser and renderer for OCaml
VisualFSharp - The F# compiler, F# core library, F# language service, and F# tooling integration for Visual Studio
tylerbenster.com
TradeAlgo - Stock trading algorithm written in Python for TD Ameritrade.
montevideo - Live-code music in Haskell!
Alpaca-API - The Alpaca API is a developer interface for trading operations and market data reception through the Alpaca platform.
melange - A mixture of tooling combined to produce JavaScript from OCaml & Reason
koka - Koka language compiler and interpreter
awesome-cl - A curated list of awesome Common Lisp frameworks, libraries and other shiny stuff.
rescript - ReScript is a robustly typed language that compiles to efficient and human-readable JavaScript.
