fp-core.rs VS monad-challenges

Learn something that pays the bill first - nowadays it's Golang/Rust react/typescript. Then you can try some pure fp libs like fp-ts and fp-core.rs, and look through existing scala cats docs. If you'll feel bad about it - that's totally fine and expectable, fp takes a paradigm shift and not that many dev able to shift their brains way of thought due to basic psychological rigidity) (inability to change habits and to modify concepts/attitudes once developed). And that's purely a staffing and management issue - folks hired randoms out of the blue, and called 'em a team.

One kata that I love is the random number challenge in Mighty Byte's Haskell monad challenges: https://github.com/mightybyte/monad-challenges (doesn't seem to be hosted anywhere any more...) Here is my attempt at making it a bit more straight forward: https://github.com/ygt-mikekchar/applicative-kata Beware, though: it's not finished and there are areas that are downright wrong. Here is a weird ES6 implementation: https://github.com/ygt-mikekchar/es6-monad-challenge

I'm new to contributing to open source. Can someone weigh in on the etiquette on forking the monad-challenges repo to port it to PureScript? The text says it's licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), and the only code is MCPrelude.hs, and the LICENSE file looks like it has a standard BSD 3 clause license, so it seems like a fork would be OK. Do people usually contact the authors to get their blessings too?

I thought the Monad Challenges at http://mightybyte.github.io/monad-challenges/ were great for that, but is done in Haskell and uses a slightly customized Prelude. Porting to Purescript should be pretty straightforward