foundation VS streaming-commons

Compare foundation vs streaming-commons and see what are their differences.

foundation

☁️♮🏛 This repo contains several documents related to the operation of the CNCF. File non-technical issues related to CNCF here. (by cncf)

streaming-commons

Common lower-level functions needed by various streaming data libraries (by fpco)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
foundation streaming-commons
11 1
517 36
1.6% -
9.3 3.0
1 day ago 11 months ago
Rich Text Format Haskell
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

foundation

Posts with mentions or reviews of foundation. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-25.
  • OpenTF Announces Fork of Terraform
    28 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Aug 2023
    Terraform was (and I assume currently, OpenTF) under an MPL license, which is not currently compatible with the approved licenses that the CNCF supports: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/main/allowed-third-p...

    For them to get accepted into the CNCF would require relicensing a large amount of MPL work. What's always been confusing to me about Hashicorp's change and any subsequent relicense of OpenTF is that I know for a fact not everyone who contributed code to Terraform signed the CLA and allowed permission to relicense.

    I suspect if OpenTF tries to relicense to a more permissive license like Apache 2 (rather than less in the case of BSL) license we might see some fireworks.

    28 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Aug 2023
    The CNCF has made exceptions on their license policy before, specifically for MPL based software. It'll probably be easier for OpenTF to go through that process than to relicense (which is likely not even possible for anyone other than Hashicorp).

    - https://github.com/cncf/foundation/tree/main/license-excepti...

    - https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/main/license-excepti...

  • ebpf 月报 - 2023 年 1 月
    2 projects | dev.to | 26 Jan 2023
  • A call to the open source community for help!
    2 projects | /r/opensource | 21 Nov 2021
    His behavior offends me as a professional software engineer and/ in my opinion, violates CNCF Code of Conduct https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md.
  • Is Cloud Native meaningless jargon?
    3 projects | /r/devops | 13 Oct 2021
    Anyone can become a member. Non-profit as in https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/charter.md
  • Minio Changes License to AGPL
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Apr 2021
    https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/allowed-third...

    I haven't read the details, or ever seen this policy before (I'm new to both projects) but it was summarized by one of our counterparts at the Linux Foundation here:

    https://twitter.com/cra/status/1384859663615864833

    Tl;dr: licenses must be approved for use, and the CNCF has this list of allowed licenses, AGPL is not on it. The CNCF is in the business of distributing permissively-licensed software is the short version I guess. I don't understand, I don't work on the legal side, I am a dev and I support end users.

    It seems if your Apache 2.0 licensed project needs to modify and distribute as modified Grafana, which it seems likely we will need to do at some point, then you cannot distribute them together. Chris says they are going to work something out, but when a component has made a decision to re-license with a restrictive-copyleft license such as AGPL, I don't know what there is that can be done.

    Maybe the CNCF adopts AGPL too, (which would mean that then all those "viral-GPL" FUD-spreaders will have been right...) that seems counter-productive if that is the outcome.

streaming-commons

Posts with mentions or reviews of streaming-commons. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-13.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing foundation and streaming-commons you can also consider the following projects:

streaming-conduit - Bidirectional support between the streaming and conduit libraries

streaming-bytestring - effectful sequences of bytes; an alternative no-lazy-io implementation of Data.ByteString.Lazy

streaming-utils - experimental http, attoparsec and pipes material for `streaming` and `streaming-bytestring`

streaming-with - with/bracket-style idioms for use with streaming

streaming-concurrency - Concurrency for the streaming ecosystem

streaming-cassava - Cassava support for the streaming library

netboot.xyz - Your favorite operating systems in one place. A network-based bootable operating system installer based on iPXE.

streaming - An optimized general monad transformer for streaming applications, with a simple prelude of functions

minio - The Object Store for AI Data Infrastructure

PIVX - Protected Instant Verified Transactions - Core wallet.

streaming-fft - sliding fast fourier transform using haskell streaming

autocert - [mirror] Go supplementary cryptography libraries