fluxible VS redux

Html.jsx - My HTML jsx component that tries to import/require the CSS. This is an isomorphic app (using Fluxbile), hence needing to have the actual HTML as a rendered component. Using the require statement seen in this file, in any part of my application, gives the error described.

I'm stunned that anyone is still using Fluxible at this point. You are referring to https://www.npmjs.com/package/fluxible, right?

Some popular JavaScript libraries like Redux has been inspired by this architecture.

Learn Redux

React: Redux, Zustand

If you need more in depth information check out the documentation. https://redux.js.org/ It's actually pretty great.

I just explained what combineReducers is in Redux. After you finish this article and return to this point, you’ll understand why.

In frontend, the most probably well-known approach is Flux and its most common implementation, Redux. This is an example of unidirectional data flow.

The best known example of an architecture with unidirectional data flow is Flux and, as its implementation, Redux.

CRA makes integrating libraries like Redux and React Router easy without requiring complex Webpack and Babel configurations.

Dva. A plugin-based state management solution (Redux + Sagas). Also quite popular in narrow communities outside of the Umi world.

If you use Redux or the useReducer() hook, the idea is almost the same. Instead of reducing data, we are reducing actions. What we've referred to as the accumulator is accumulating the state, and the value is whatever action is being performed to update the state. We can take a group of actions and allow each one to make changes.