flux2-multi-tenancy VS ko

You may look at multi tenant deployment of fluxcd at https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2-multi-tenancy where you can have shared infrastructure repo to bootstrap flux with terraform (if you wish) and then a repo per team to manage k8s resources.

Bootstrap Flux v2 to the cluster via Gitlab CI then deploy everything else using their multi tenant approach - https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2-multi-tenancy

We are exploring this GitOps trend at Playtomic. We have two k8s clusters running using Flux and ArgoCD. We have a multi-tenancy setup, that is, one repo for the cluster itself, one repo for every application we deploy in the cluster. Flux and ArgoCD image updaters are in place.

Maybe this is helpful https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2-multi-tenancy

Apko leverages the APK package format from Alpine and draws inspiration from ko, a fast container image builder for Go applications.

- There're many resources available about containerizing an application, but I suggest you buildpacks or ko, which doesn't require writing a Dockerfile

ko

You don't need to write and manage Dockerfiles. Simply just use ko: https://github.com/google/ko (You also don't need Docker Engine)

Or don't write a Dockerfile at all, and use ko: https://github.com/google/ko

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "ko"

It depends on your use case, but have you ever tried google/ko?

If you're using Go, I recommend https://github.com/google/ko (shameless plug), or for Java, use Jib.

I would recommend Google Ko if you are packaging Go apps: https://github.com/google/ko