flutter_redux VS splat

Compare flutter_redux vs splat and see what are their differences.

flutter_redux

A library that connects Widgets to a Redux Store (by brianegan)

splat

Makes things cross-platform (by reactiveui)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
flutter_redux splat
2 16
1,648 963
- 1.0%
0.0 8.8
12 months ago 6 days ago
Dart C#
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

flutter_redux

Posts with mentions or reviews of flutter_redux. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-11.

splat

Posts with mentions or reviews of splat. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-21.
  • Detailed thoughts on the State of the .NET Foundation · Discussion #60 · dotnet-foundation/Home
    2 projects | /r/dotnet | 21 Oct 2021
    I read through the PR discussion in question as part of reading Rob Mensching's post before I came across this discussion, and thought that she'd overstepped. However, after watching Tim Corey go through the same discussion, I realise that not only did she overstep, she appeared to actively (and publicly) fight with the current maintainer. Her actions appear (to me) to be completely arrogant, selfish, uncaring, and frankly dangerous to the project.
  • Microsoft locks .NET hot reload capabilities behind Visual Studio 2022
    13 projects | /r/programming | 21 Oct 2021
    Head of .NET Foundation creates and merges a PR for a change they made to a project where they hadn't been active for several years. When confronted by current maintainers, their response was at the very least, hostile and poorly thought out.
  • How the .NET Foundation kerfuffle became a brouhaha
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Oct 2021
    Many projects joined the .NET Foundation after it was created. It didn't really do anything, but it wasn't harming anyone either.

    The .NET Foundation asked for owner access on a repository (for their CLA bot). The author declined and a workaround was organized.

    Years later the .NET Foundation asked for owner access on a repository (to allow them enforce Code of Conduct across all repositories. The author declined.

    The CLA bot stopped working. The author was told it would work if he gave it owner access. The author was annoyed because they previously had a workaround. They gave in and gave @dnfadmin owner access.

    The author woke up and realized that the project had now been silently moved to GitHub Enterprise. The author states that projects in GitHub Enterprise can be entirely controlled by the owner of the account (the .NET Foundation). This transfer happened silently.

    Independently, this happened to another project (who had coincidentally had an issue with a Microsoft employee and former contributor force a pull-request into their project: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/778).

    People are upset because of how tone-deaf all of this is. They would like the .NET Foundation to stop trying to gain complete control over the member projects. They would like Microsoft employees to not force pull requests into their projects.

  • I'm Sorry
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Oct 2021
    > and the PR is still merged.

    It looks like the actual maintainer reverted it?

    https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/779

    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Oct 2021
    > I am not versed in all the details here

    You should probably read the conversation in the PR: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/778

    > there is a dire need for professional communications training among these programmers.

    Maybe, but probably not why you think.

    Once you've read the PR's conversation you'll see this isn't about someone just merging a PR which wasn't approved. This about someone submitting a PR, a maintainer asking for discussion before merging it, ignoring the maintainer and just merge the PR, the maintainer asking why it wasn't discussed and then making a snide remark to the maintainer.

    So I agree that the "Sorry for merging a PR" isn't going to cut it here. The merging of the PR was the least of the problem. It's a hollow corporate-style apology where someone is allowed to be called out for. It's like saying: "Sorry I hurt your toe" after you pushed someone of a cliff.

    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Oct 2021
    I think the apology is here because the author of the PR doesn't want to revert it. As you can see, it's still merged: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/blob/b930a34badfb2164f38...
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Oct 2021
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Oct 2021
    "Sorry I opened a PR and merged it without discussion" is not an honest description of what happened (https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/778), and therefore the apology seems very insincere.

    You can't apologize and at the same time minimize the thing you actually did. It's pretty much like ending your apology with a "but". And this (not really) apology is a big "but".

    More to the point though, this apology attempt made it worse. It starts off with a dishonest apology, and then goes into a big policy and contract debate.

    Why would you conflate the two? Whatever point you're then trying to make about policy and ownership is tainted by both the personal misstep (I call it that unsarcastically) and by the insincere apology.

    It's needlessly ineffective.

    1. It makes your apology sound like "I'm sorry, but I'm the dictator here"

    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Oct 2021
    Well if you ask me I’d like to see an apology for both the whitespace change and not following the existing code style (re: XML close tag):

    https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commit/cd2cbb807b36dd89b...

    That’s some grade A hornet nest kicking right there.

    (…said with irony)

    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Oct 2021
    You're looking at the older version of the file. Here's the complete history:

    https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commits/main/src/Directo...

    So it was merged, then reverted almost immediately, and then reimplemented by the project maintainers in the manner they preferred (without a new dependency).

What are some alternatives?

When comparing flutter_redux and splat you can also consider the following projects:

riverpod - A reactive caching and data-binding framework. Riverpod makes working with asynchronous code a breeze.

get_it - Get It - Simple direct Service Locator that allows to decouple the interface from a concrete implementation and to access the concrete implementation from everywhere in your App. Maintainer: @escamoteur

fish-redux - An assembled flutter application framework.

dart-code-metrics - Software analytics tool that helps developers analyse and improve software quality.

bloc - A predictable state management library that helps implement the BLoC design pattern

azure-cli - Azure Command-Line Interface

cube - Simple State Manager (Focusing on simplicity and rebuilding only the necessary)

mobx.dart - MobX for the Dart language. Hassle-free, reactive state-management for your Dart and Flutter apps.

Analogy.LogViewer - A customizable Log Viewer with ability to create custom providers. Can be used with C#, C++, Python, Java and others

node - Node.js JavaScript runtime ✨🐢🚀✨

Home - This is the landing repository for the .NET foundation efforts. Start here!