fltk-rs VS flamegraph

I have added a tile example to the repo, it's based on the FLTK example.

fltk-accesskit is an accesskit integration crate for fltk-rs, the gui crate. It's implemented as an external crate to allow for more experimentation before stabilizing the api, especially since fltk is at version 1.4.

fltk-rs worked well for me, for a small app.

Gtk doesn’t require you to write xml, you can write your gui code in Rust. You also have https://github.com/fltk-rs/fltk-rs

Currently, I have narrowed potential libraries to: 1. Flutter 2. FLTK 3. Relm (GTK) 4. iced 5. Slint 6. Imgui, Imgui-rs 7. and gtk-rs

FLTK

The fltk-rs library provides Rust bindings for the FLTK toolkit. The fltk-rs crate supports old architecture with more than 80 customizable widgets and more than four supported theme schemes, including the GTK scheme. You can also use the fltk-theme crate for more customizations.

A friend of mine grew tired of plotting libraries that did not allow adding data points to his plot interactively like you can in Matlab, so he wrote one using FLTK using C++. I refactored his code a bit and then ported to Rust using the fltk-rs crate. Recently I needed this library for a project and I noticed I had not made it publicly available on Github. So I present to you the fltk-plot library!

fltk-rs is a Rust bindings crate for FLTK, the cross-platfrom & lightweight gui library.

Besides GTK I can recommend FLTK. It has been around for a long time and is very stable.

You can install cargo-flamegraph with cargo install flamegraph. There are some underlying requirements to be able to use cargo-flamegraph; you will want to take a look at the repo here to make sure you have the right dependencies.

I tried to diagnose the issue with flamegraph, but unfortunately the flamegraph didn't show anything beyond the next call for some reason

having some tools to identify slowness origins (flamegraph is one... but not sure it's the way to go)

I'm currently implementing a solution for the first part of the day 16. It work but it is really slow... I'd like to : - understand why - having some tools to identify slowness origins (flamegraph is one... but not sure it's the way to go) - eventually have some clue/solution/idea - have general feedback on what in my "coding style" is not appropriate for rust (I come from java/kotlin/ts even if I've already coded a bit in c/c++) : for example I love iterator & sequence but i feel they are not really suited to overuse in rust (mostly because of async & result).

Use a profiler. Flamegraph is a good way to visualise profiler output. This lets you identify which functions are taking up a large amount of time - and hence helps you identify where to focus your optimisation efforts.

You tried trying to see what takes the most time under load via flames? https://github.com/flamegraph-rs/flamegraph

Well, in cases like that the answer is straight forward, use a profiler like https://github.com/flamegraph-rs/flamegraph

I don't see any obvious problems with your algorithm. I've had luck using cargo-flamegraph to identify the slow parts of my code. That's going to show you which parts to focus on improving the performance of!

From the readme of cargo flamegraph: