Flowable (V6) VS bucket4j

I’m doing a lot of exploratory work with BPMN right now.

I think if your business is largely transactional (think Stripe), there is a lot of value to be had by framing your development as “business process automation”.

The term (and BPMN) has a lot of enterprise baggage, but some of the tools out there [0][1] are well suited to orchestrating services (and people where necessary) as a single automated process. The the ability to build that flow visually using BPMN, and then execute it in a workflow engine where you can monitor it, audit it, and optimize over time is pretty compelling.

Here’s an interesting read on the topic: https://www.infoq.com/articles/events-workflow-automation/

[0] https://github.com/camunda-cloud/zeebe

[1] https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine

-- Bucket4J

And many other APIs.

If you work with Java and need a rate-limiting in your project, please look to Bucket4j.

GitHub: https://github.com/bucket4j/bucket4j

Report about Bucket4j: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kG_hF7p7xYI

Thank you for your attention!

Hi everyone! I want to present the library to provide rate-limiting in Java. Bucket4J - this is the most popular library to provide rate-limiting in Java. I invite each person to familiarize themselves with Bucket4J. We have been working for more than 7 years for the community and we want to make the library and open-source better. Bucket4J is used in many other libraries, such as Kubernetes client, JHipster, Atlassian, Twitch4J, and other popular libraries. Now we are going to huge release 7.0 with many features, we will publish about that a little bit later (in a few weeks). I hope with your support, we will be glad to your any contribution/suggestions/ideas.

See https://github.com/vladimir-bukhtoyarov/bucket4j and https://github.com/cowwoc/token-bucket for alternatives.