FishNet VS fishtest

2) Rewrite it in Unity and use something like Photon or FishNet: https://www.photonengine.com/fusion https://github.com/FirstGearGames/FishNet

Which brings me to the next thing... If you ever want to jump between release all past versions and pre-releases are found here https://github.com/FirstGearGames/FishNet/releases

But he recommends https://github.com/FirstGearGames/FishNet

Crossfades are a little tricky. You're welcome to see how I do it in my networking solution https://github.com/FirstGearGames/FishNet/blob/main/Assets/FishNet/Runtime/Generated/Component/NetworkAnimator/NetworkAnimator.cs

Use Mirror, or the new Fish-Net solution.

I've been a bit "Unity offline", and even more so when it comes to networking solutions, because of my real job :), but LiteNetLib is quite good. There's also a new HLAPI solution called FishNet which seems very interesting.

Unity has a horrible history of f'ing up their network solutions, so I have no high hopes for it. Just because of that, I would go for Mirror (or maybe FishNet, which looks very promising, but I haven't had time to test yet).

you can have a look at openbench maybe, https://github.com/AndyGrant/OpenBench . It is currently a testing framework for chess engines (only invited ones) or fishtest. https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests Stockfish testing framework. Both of these test if change A beats the master version using statistics. Both look at the git repository and download it and create/compile the engine, that might be another solution for you.

[4]: https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest/wiki/Regression-Tests#...

FishTest has thousands of computers running 24/7 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests. Nerds at gcp,aws,universities burn thousands of GPU hours on lc0-client just to watch their GPUs warm up. They aren't just attaching 20tb of endgames to an old macbook.

if removing any rng from stockfish would gain elo it would be merged. If you think it gains elo feel free to submit a test to https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests , but it doesn't so what your saying makes no sense.

Where did you get these numbers from? https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest/wiki/Regression-Tests shows an elo difference of 351.3 elo points. This is further exaggerated by the fact that sf9 lacks nnue and is particularly weak at the starting position and consequently 960 starting positions.

In https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest/wiki/Regression-Tests you can see 8moves_v3.pgn opening book (09/11/2013 - current) with a link:

You can see the various code changes in https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest/wiki/Regression-Tests . Both the actual change and the elo change from the code change.

Current progression test is still in progress but you can see all of the previous ones here: https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest/wiki/Regression-Tests