firezone
wg-access-server
Our great sponsors
| firezone | wg-access-server | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | 14 | |
| 6,207 | 1,748 | |
| 2.9% | - | |
| 9.9 | 0.0 | |
| about 12 hours ago | about 2 months ago | |
| Elixir | TypeScript | |
| Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
firezone
- WireGuard -based scalable remote access platform
-
Self-Hosted Mesh Network / VPN For User-Friendly LAN Gaming Network?
https://github.com/firezone/firezone (4.4k stars)
- Anyone centrally managing clients VPN connections/users/settings?
- Upgrading VPN solutions in a remote working Environment
-
Free VPN solutions that support SAML auth?
Firezone might be an option. WG based, easy to deploy. Enterprise features etc. https://github.com/firezone/firezone
- Self-hosted Tailscale alternative?
- [Self Hosted] Hinzufügen von SSO zu unserem selbst gehosteten WireGuard VPN-Server (Firezone)
-
Looking for VPN solution that supports split tunneling & authentication via Google
If you were looking for something other then an openVPN based VPN. Take a look at Tailscale or https://github.com/firezone/firezone which run Wireguard... Tailscale is nice however you don't manage the control plane.
- Wireguard self-hosted solution for large number of users
-
Most used selfhosted services in 2022?
Firezone (https://github.com/firezone/firezone) Wireguard-VPN Server with SSO capability
wg-access-server
-
Most overrated and most underrated selfhosted software, in your opinion?
I tried them all. I settled on wg-access-server.
-
A Primer: Accessing Services in Kubernetes
Yes, at my startup we run https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server inside our kubernetes clusters to give engineers access to local pods vs the k8s DNS (.svc.cluster.local). It works relatively well but we've had to make a couple modifications:
1. I had to deploy CoreDNS to our cluster and set up DNS query rewriting to redirect queries from .cluster.mystartup to *.svc.cluster.local because docker on OS X has issues resolving hostnames that end in .local
-
An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution with a web ui for connecting devices
What is the difference from https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server ?
- Wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution with a web UI
-
Firezone, an open-source WireGuard-based alternative to OpenVPN
Not sure why this is downvoted. I use a similar service that runs in docker just fine. https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server
- Netmaker 0.7 - Very Fast Linux Server Networking over WireGuard and Other Things
What are some alternatives?
Netmaker - Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Netmaker automates fast, secure, and distributed virtual networks.
wg-gen-web - Simple Web based configuration generator for WireGuard
wg-easy - The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN + Web-based Admin UI. [Moved to: https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy]
wireguard-install - WireGuard VPN installer for Linux servers
wireguard-ui - Wireguard web interface
subspace - A simple WireGuard VPN server GUI
headscale - An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server
Nebula - A scalable overlay networking tool with a focus on performance, simplicity and security
wg-easy - The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN + Web-based Admin UI.
docker-guacamole - A self-contained guacamole docker container for x64 and ARM. Remotely connect over SSH, RDP or VNC using HTML5.
wirehole - WireHole is a combination of WireGuard, Pi-hole, and Unbound in a docker-compose project with the intent of enabling users to quickly and easily create a personally managed full or split-tunnel WireGuard VPN with ad blocking capabilities thanks to Pi-hole, and DNS caching, additional privacy options, and upstream providers via Unbound.