filetags VS datacurator-filetree

For my personal tool-set, I've settled for "everything in the file name" because in my experience, this ensures that no meta-data gets lost when moving paths, on thumb drives with ancient file systems, OS-borders and so forth (https://github.com/novoid/filetags + other tools + https://karl-voit.at/managing-digital-photographs/ as an overview).

Technically, it makes use of filename-based time-stamps and tags by the "filetags"-method which also includes the rather unique TagTrees feature as one particular retrieval method.

What do you mean by filetags? This?

I don't know if this is perfect but for me, this method with its tools is working pretty great since a decade or so: Managing Digital Files (e.g., Photographs) in Files and Folders using filetags (all sorts of things related to tags), guess-filename (generates most file names for me), guess-target-folder and move2archive (moving files to their destination) + some more tools I wrote.

filetags and companions

filetags and its companion tools is a direct result of my PhD projects with tagstore. For the basic concept of filetags, I worked with file tagging methods for at least six years.

I've always thought that personal files, photos, or any other kind of just needed more connections between them to improve my information retrieval experience. That's how I had become a Zettelkasten evangelist. I believed it would be the cure for the information overload disease of our era.

But life made me use Emacs org-mode more and more, and I'm now in love with tags. Retrieving information has become so easy, especially with org-mode's tags inheritance, that I hardly think making connections between headings or notes is necessary anymore[1]. And I believe that applying tags to filenames (a la Karl Voit [2]) will create the same effect

[1] A Zettelkasten-like system is still unbeatable imo when it comes to ideas repositories, i.e. a second brain you can talk to and get new insights. It's just not that great for personal knowledge management or project management.

[2] https://github.com/novoid/filetags

Technically, it makes use of filename-based time-stamps and tags by the "filetags"-method which also includes the rather unique TagTrees feature as one particular retrieval method.

For the most part I follow this file tree. However when it comes to some of my intererests, like electronics, I am unsure if I should keep splitting these interest-based files by file type, for example:

I have redesigned my entire computer to follow the datacurator methodology: https://github.com/roboyoshi/datacurator-filetree/tree/main/root

P.S. I've been lurking this sub and have considered this particular problem for a long time and have read maybe everything Karl, Nayuki, Reddit, and Hacker News have had to say on the subject. Running into this post is a treat. If tags don't work out for you roboyoshi and contributors have made a really nice unified file tree https://github.com/roboyoshi/datacurator-filetree

As always, credit to u/Roboyoshi for the Datacurator filetree.

But it will obviously depend on the use case. As example you have JohnnyDecimal or a more simple approach

This tool will be useful to generate repos like these and sharing them with friends without actually needing to share them TB of data.

back in the days I started with this structure tho: https://github.com/roboyoshi/datacurator-filetree

This is a mix of this post and https://github.com/roboyoshi/datacurator-filetree. Im still having trouble with a few things: