feedback VS delta

Just learnt about this GitHub feature although it looks like it has been removed.

Azure skills navigator - the new developer's "Guide to the Cloud"Markdown: An option to highlight a "Note" and "Warning" using blockquote (Beta)

Link to the alternative proposal is in this comment: https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/16925#discuss...

(I work at GitHub.) We've started using our Discussions product for feedback. You can post a discussion here:

https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/categories/ge...

> - Why can’t I choose the colors of web sites and applications?

For what it's worth, Firefox lets you edit them:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.php?title=UserContent.css&pr...

Not terribly easily, but you can do it for any site. For example I fixed a GitHub bug for myself: https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/8098#discussi...

I’m really excited for Git’s recent addition of commit signing with SSH keys. It already works with 1Password SSH and I can’t wait for GitHub and Gitlab to support verification!

As recently I felt the need (for organizational level reporting) to synchronize labels on distinct repos (see dedicated feedback) :

There's more details here: https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/4992#discussi...

> we have also introduced an x-robots-tag: none in the http response header of Wiki pages

> Abusive behavior in Wikis had a negative impact on our search engine ranking

Martin from GitHub here. The "leaderboards" are actually what you see as "Most Helpful" tables in GitHub Discussions (see https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions for an example). We should probably change the language on that settings screen - thanks!

Thanks for the difftastic & zoxide tips.

However, I've been using this git pager/difftool: https://github.com/dandavison/delta

While it's not structural like difft, it does produce more readable output for me (at least when scrolling fast through git log -p /scanning quickly

View on GitHub

I'm currently waiting on the integration between Delta and Difftastic:

https://github.com/dandavison/delta/issues/535

Difftastic now has JSON output, whic should make it much easier to build this.

Semi-related, I recently discovered https://github.com/dandavison/delta: A syntax-highlighting pager for git, diff, and grep output

It appears to enable choosing between unified and split views for each of those tools.

I'm surely in the minority here. I've been using Emacs for almost a decade now, but I just can't get into the Magit workflow. I've tried several times, but always end up going back to Git on the command line. I have dozens of aliases, shell integrations, a nice diff viewer[1], etc., and interacting with Git has become muscle memory. I can commit, cherry-pick, rebase, bisect, fix conflicts, etc., in a fraction of the time it would take me to navigate Magit's UI. I'm sure with enough practice, a Magit user could do this more quickly and efficiently, but honestly, with some custom-built porcelain, Git's UI is not so bad. Though this could very well be Stockholm syndrome after using it for such a long time...

For whatever reason, Magit's opinionated workflows never clicked with me. A part of it is the concern that it will do something weird to my repo that I'll then have to waste more time undoing manually. I usually don't trust sugary wrappers around tools. And another is the fact I don't use Emacs on all machines, and setting up Git on a remote system is just a matter of copying over my config and some shell integrations.

Also, on a more personal note, I find the cultish fanboyism whenever Magit is brought up slightly offputting. Does anyone have anything bad to say about it? No software can realistically be this infallible. :)

[1]: https://github.com/dandavison/delta

and for just in terminal also check out https://github.com/dandavison/delta for nicer looking diffs, didn't really like the defaults, but with some config I really like it.