fdroiddata
adblock-rust
Our great sponsors
fdroiddata | adblock-rust | |
---|---|---|
132 | 53 | |
- | 1,271 | |
- | 2.1% | |
- | 8.2 | |
- | 5 days ago | |
Rust | ||
- | Mozilla Public License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fdroiddata
- F-Droid: WireGuard inclusion policy violation (auto-update w/o explicit consent)
- Proposal to relax in-app updater policy for Reproducable Build apps
-
Publishing to F-Droid
Fork this repository.
-
Help with ReactNative Reproducible builds in FDroid
For reference my app: project: https://github.com/balzack/databag merge request: https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/merge_requests/12183
- Amethyst an Android Nostr client removed from F-Droid
-
Gitlab pipeline - checkupdate stage failed
You should add a new entry in "Builds". Have a look at how Newpipe does it for each new version here for example.
-
Google account deleted after 2 hours of Aurora
To me it's not very clear whether those terms practically apply only to their app, since clearly they can't grab logs from Aurora if Aurora doesn't dump those logs for example... but if this is something the F-Droid team should look into, open an issue on https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/issues or inquire in one of their official channels on OFTC (#fdroid) or Matrix (#fdroid:f-droid.org).
- Amethyst (nostr client) is not FOSS
-
difference between the various Osmand versions - and f-droid
OsmAnd~ from F-Droid not having Android Auto is a known bug: see the discussions at https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/issues/2567 , https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/13514, https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/3391 and https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/15400
-
How to discover new FOSS apps?
You can also get F-Droid Build Status which I believe will let you see apps that are being attempted to be built even if their build isn't succeeding yet, again for the "catching things early experience". Or, just keep an eye on the issues, merge requests and commits at fdroiddata which is where people actually add new metadata for new apps to be built by F-Droid, and it often takes a while between an app being first mentioned, and it being able to be included, for many possible reasons.
adblock-rust
-
In June 2024, ad blockers such as uBlock Origin will be disabled in Chrome 127
Brave has written their own (open source) adblock engine (in rust) that is directly integrated into the browser (ie. not an extension, so is not affected by Manifest V3).
https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust
Here is a (somewhat dated) article describing it by the authors:
https://brave.com/improved-ad-blocker-performance/
- Brave's Rust-based adblock engine
-
uBlock Origin 1.50.0
Brave has its own Rust implementation of an adblocker embedded in the browser: https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust; so it does not embed uBlock Origin (but the filters are mostly compatible)
Disclaimer: I work at Brave but not on the browser.
-
Does Brave now fully support Procedural Filtering or is uBlock still needed?
We support :has currently, which impacts many filters in EL and uBO. Some non-supported filters such as upward() can be manually converted over to use :has instead. The other unsupported procedual filters are a WIP will depend how easy/hard they are implement. No ETA, but have opened a ticket https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust/issues/293
-
Firefox extends its anti-tracking protection to Android
ublock on chromium and brave itself can't use all of the filters in that list: https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust/issues/4
-
take your daily medicine guys
It's open source https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust
-
$removeparam not working in filter lists
I've fixed this in the adblock engine as of https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust/commit/8a755bdb190bb55a3a3acee1e6507085051bdeec, and I'll push to get this patched in 1.47 soon. Thanks for the reports!
- How bad will the scope of *privacy* on the web be if firefox dies?
- Release Channel 1.47.171
What are some alternatives?
OsmAnd - OsmAnd
brave-browser - Brave browser for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows.
nextdns - NextDNS CLI client (DoH Proxy)
uBlock - uBlock Origin - An efficient blocker for Chromium and Firefox. Fast and lean.
Nebulo - Mirror of https://git.frostnerd.com/PublicAndroidApps/smokescreen. Feel free to contribute here as well.
ungoogled-chromium - Google Chromium, sans integration with Google
OpenBoard - 100% foss keyboard based on AOSP, with no dependency on Google binaries, that respects your privacy.
qutebrowser - A keyboard-driven, vim-like browser based on Python and Qt.
Smart-AutoClicker - An open-source auto clicker on images for Android
qtwebkit - Code in this repository is obsolete. Use this fork: https://github.com/movableink/webkit
floccus - :cloud: Sync your bookmarks privately across browsers and devices
icecat-win64