fd
micro-editor
Our great sponsors
fd | micro-editor | |
---|---|---|
172 | 227 | |
31,495 | 23,872 | |
- | - | |
8.8 | 8.9 | |
8 days ago | 2 days ago | |
Rust | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fd
-
Level Up Your Dev Workflow: Conquer Web Development with a Blazing Fast Neovim Setup (Part 1)
ripgrep: A super-fast file searcher. You can install it using your system's package manager (e.g., brew install ripgrep on macOS). fd: Another blazing-fast file finder. Installation instructions can be found here: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd
-
Hyperfine: A command-line benchmarking tool
hyperfine is such a great tool that it's one of the first I reach for when doing any sort of benchmarking.
I encourage anyone who's tried hyperfine and enjoyed it to also look at sharkdp's other utilities, they're all amazing in their own right with fd[1] being the one that perhaps get the most daily use for me and has totally replaced my use of find(1).
[1]: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd
-
Z – Jump Around
You call it with `n` and get an interactive fuzzy search for your directories. If you do `n ` instead, it’ll start the find with `` already filled in (and if there’s only one match, jump to it directly). The `ls` is optional but I find that I like having the contents visible as soon as I change a directory.
I’m also including iCloud Drive but excluding the Library directory as that is too noisy. I have a separate `nl` function which searches just inside `~/Library` for when I need it, as well as other specialised `n` functions that search inside specific places that I need a lot.
¹ https://github.com/sharkdp/fd
² https://github.com/junegunn/fzf
-
Unix as IDE: Introduction (2012)
Many (most?) of them have been overhauled with success. For find there is fd[1]. There's batcat, exa (ls), ripgrep, fzf, atuin (history), delta (diff) and many more.
Most are both backwards compatible and fresh and friendly. Your hardwon muscle memory still of good use. But there's sane flags and defaults too. It's faster, more colorful (if you wish), better integration with another (e.g. exa/eza or aware of git modifications). And, in my case, often features I never knew I needed (atuin sync!, ripgrep using gitignore).
1 https://github.com/sharkdp/fd
- Tell HN: My Favorite Tools
-
Potencializando Sua Experiência no Linux: Conheça as Ferramentas em Rust para um Desenvolvimento Eficiente
Descubra mais sobre o fd em: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd
-
Making Hard Things Easy
AFAIK there is a find replacement with sane defaults: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd , a lot of people I know love it.
However, I already have this in my muscle memory:
-
🐚🦀Comandos shell reescritos em Rust
fd
-
Oils 0.17.0 – YSH Is Becoming Real
> without zsh globs I have to remember find syntax
My "solution" to this is using https://github.com/sharkdp/fd (even when in zsh and having glob support). I'm not sure if using a tool that's not present by default would be suitable for your use cases, but if you're considering alternate shells, I suspect you might be
-
Bfs 3.0: The Fastest Find Yet
Nice to see other alternatives to find. I personally use fd (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) a lot, as I find the UX much better. There is one thing that I think could be better, around the difference between "wanting to list all files that follow a certain pattern" and "wanting to find one or a few specific files". Technically, those are the same, but an issue I'll often run into is wanting to search something in dotfiles (for example the Go tools), use the unrestricted mode, and it'll find the few files I'm looking for, alongside hundreds of files coming from some cache/backup directory somewhere. This happens even more with rg, as it'll look through the files contents.
I'm not sure if this is me not using the tool how I should, me not using Linux how I should, me using the wrong tool for this job, something missing from the tool or something else entirely. I wonder if other people have this similar "double usage issue", and I'm interested in ways to avoid it.
micro-editor
- Ask HN: What software sparks joy when using?
- Modeless Vim
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
To see more screenshots of micro, showcasing some of the default color schemes, see here.
-
Go: What We Got Right, What We Got Wrong
Not sure these are really popular, but I cannot resist advertising a few utilities written in Go that I regularly use in my daily workflow:
- gdu: a NCDU clone, much faster on SSD mounts [1]
- duf: a `df` clone with a nicer interface [2]
- massren: a `vidir` clone (simpler to use but with fewer options) [3]
- gotop: a `top` clone [4]
- micro: a nice TUI editor [5]
Building this kind of tools in Go makes sense, as the executables are statically compiled and are thus easy to install on remote servers.
[1]: https://github.com/dundee/gdu
[2]: https://github.com/muesli/duf
[3]: https://github.com/laurent22/massren
[4]: https://github.com/xxxserxxx/gotop
[5]: https://github.com/zyedidia/micro
-
Text Editor: Data Structures
> The worst way to store and manipulate text is to use an array.
Claim made from theoretical considerations, without any actual reference to real-world editors. The popular Micro[1] text editor uses a simple line array[2], and performs fantastically well on real-world editing tasks.
Meanwhile, ropes are so complicated that even high-quality implementations have extremely subtle bugs[3] that can lead to state or content corruption.
Which data structure is "best" is not just a function of its asymptotic performance. Practical considerations are equally important (arguably more so).
[1] https://github.com/zyedidia/micro
[2] https://github.com/zyedidia/micro/blob/master/internal/buffe...
[3] https://github.com/cessen/ropey/pull/67
- A nano like text editor built with pure C
-
A simple guide for configuring sudo and doas
There are two main ways to configure sudo.The first one is using the sudoers file.It is located at /etc/sudoers for Linux,and /usr/local/etc/sudoers for FreeBSD respectively.The paths are different,but the configuration works in the same way. A typical sudoers file looks like this. The sudoers file must be edited with the visudo command,which ensures the config is free of errors.Running this command as the root user will result in opening vi by default.If you want to use a different editor you can set the VISUAL environment varaible to the editor you want. For example,if you want to use micro as the text editor run:
-
what terminal emulator do you use and why?
found that micro has dedicated info page for copy paste
-
Microsoft is exploring adding a command line text editor into Windows, and it wants your feedback
micro: winget install zyedidia.micro
- What is the best basic ass text editor?
What are some alternatives?
telescope.nvim - Find, Filter, Preview, Pick. All lua, all the time.
helix - A post-modern modal text editor.
ripgrep - ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
filemanager-plugin - A file manager plugin for the editor "Micro"
fzf - :cherry_blossom: A command-line fuzzy finder
kakoune - mawww's experiment for a better code editor
exa - A modern replacement for ‘ls’.
xclip - Command line interface to the X11 clipboard
skim - Fuzzy Finder in rust!
vim-surround - surround.vim: Delete/change/add parentheses/quotes/XML-tags/much more with ease
vim-grepper - :space_invader: Helps you win at grep.
editorconfig-core-go - EditorConfig Core written in Go