etcd VS Apache ZooKeeper

While exploring popular projects such as etcd and especially traefik, I noticed a violation of the principle that states "interfaces should belong to the package that uses values of the interface type, not the package that implements those values." For example, Here we can see that ManagerFactory import Registry interface that placed here and implementations of this interface in the same package, which violates the aforementioned principle. Even if the interface is simply a specification, it should still be defined on the consumer side. Is it considered bad practice to follow what traefik does in this case or I doesn't understand somthing? P.S. I'm newcomer, so sorry if it's silly question.

In case of data sensitivity, you can enable the encrypted communication function of etcd for encrypted data transmission. Refer to the sample script provided by the etcd project.

Step 0: You have a strong grasp on who uses the tool/product/service and for what purpose. That can take weeks, months, or years depending on the specific project you're contributing to. A little NodeJS module? Probably closer to days. etcd? Probably closer to months/years.

etcd is not secure - etcd is where Kubernetes secrets are stored. Though etcd is a distributed key/value store with great performance, it lacks key features when it comes to handling sensitive data such as audit log, key rotation, and encryption of key.

You know how Kubernetes is absolutely blowing up? Well there's one piece of technology that it all depends on -- etcd.

FROM quay.io/coreos/etcd:v3.5.0 as etcd FROM alpine:3.17 RUN apk add --no-cache tar # Taken from https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/Dockerfile-release.amd64 COPY --from=etcd /usr/local/bin/etcd /usr/local/bin/ COPY --from=etcd /usr/local/bin/etcdctl /usr/local/bin/ COPY --from=etcd /usr/local/bin/etcdutl /usr/local/bin/ COPY --from=etcd /etc/nsswitch.conf /etc/nsswitch.conf CMD ["/usr/local/bin/etcd"]

Service registry and discovery etcd, consul, nacos

Yes, Kubernetes, in fact, relies on a number of other free and open source software packages. As a base, it relies on the Docker container runtime and the CoreOS Linux distribution, and it utilizes other open source projects for a number of its components, such as etcd for distributed key-value storage. The tool's core and control plane are both built in GO programming language, making it a completely Go-based application. Kubernetes itself is an open source project and has been used as a building block for other open source projects.

APISIX stores its configuration in etcd

Next, review deployment complexity such as DB-less versus database-backed deployments. For example, Kong does require running Cassandra or Postgres. Apigee requires Cassandra, Zookeeper, and Postgres to run, while other solutions like Express Gateway and Tyk only require Redis. Apache APISIX uses etcd as its data store, it stores and manages routing-related and plugin-related configurations in etcd in the Data Plane.

zookeeper: is (was?) used for secrets management. it was also used as a basic health check, but has been since been replaced.

You can install Kafka from https://kafka.apache.org/quickstart. Because Druid and Kafka both use Apache Zookeeper, I opted to use the Zookeeper deployment that comes with Druid, so didn’t start it with Kafka. Once running, I created two topics for me to post the data into, and for Druid to ingest from:

Please note that we use Zookeeper as the Governance Center.

Next, review deployment complexity such as DB-less versus database-backed deployments. For example, Kong does require running Cassandra or Postgres. Apigee requires Cassandra, Zookeeper, and Postgres to run, while other solutions like Express Gateway and Tyk only require Redis. Apache APISIX uses etcd as its data store, it stores and manages routing-related and plugin-related configurations in etcd in the Data Plane.

ZooKeeper, a system for coordinating distributed nodes, similar to Google's Chubby

ElasticJob achieves distributed coordination through ZooKeeper. In practical scenarios, users may start multiple jobs in the same project simultaneously, all of which use the same Apache Curator client. There are certain risks due to the nature of ZooKeeper and the callback method of Curator in a single event thread.

For now we just need to know that Kafka will be running n brokers acting as a cluster. The Kafka cluster will use Zookeeper to orchestrate the brokers.

We spin up a Zookeeper instance at port 2181 internally within the Docker network (i.e. not accessible from the host)

To solve this issue we can use a distributed system manager such as Zookeeper which can provide distributed synchronization. Zookeeper can maintain multiple ranges for our servers.