etcd VS traefik

I am not sure neither. But this might overcome the etcd's soft storage limit of 8GB? [1]

[1] https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/issues/9771

Apache APISIX is an API Gateway. By default, it stores its configuration in etcd, a distributed key-value store - the same one used by Kubernetes. Note that in real-world scenarios, we should set up etcd clustering to improve the resiliency of the solution. For this post, we will limit ourselves to a single etcd instance. Apache APISIX offers an admin API via HTTP endpoints. Finally, the gateway forwards calls from the client to an upstream. Here's an overview of the architecture and the required certificates:

While exploring popular projects such as etcd and especially traefik, I noticed a violation of the principle that states "interfaces should belong to the package that uses values of the interface type, not the package that implements those values." For example, Here we can see that ManagerFactory import Registry interface that placed here and implementations of this interface in the same package, which violates the aforementioned principle. Even if the interface is simply a specification, it should still be defined on the consumer side. Is it considered bad practice to follow what traefik does in this case or I doesn't understand somthing? P.S. I'm newcomer, so sorry if it's silly question.

In case of data sensitivity, you can enable the encrypted communication function of etcd for encrypted data transmission. Refer to the sample script provided by the etcd project.

Step 0: You have a strong grasp on who uses the tool/product/service and for what purpose. That can take weeks, months, or years depending on the specific project you're contributing to. A little NodeJS module? Probably closer to days. etcd? Probably closer to months/years.

etcd is not secure - etcd is where Kubernetes secrets are stored. Though etcd is a distributed key/value store with great performance, it lacks key features when it comes to handling sensitive data such as audit log, key rotation, and encryption of key.

You know how Kubernetes is absolutely blowing up? Well there's one piece of technology that it all depends on -- etcd.

FROM quay.io/coreos/etcd:v3.5.0 as etcd FROM alpine:3.17 RUN apk add --no-cache tar # Taken from https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/Dockerfile-release.amd64 COPY --from=etcd /usr/local/bin/etcd /usr/local/bin/ COPY --from=etcd /usr/local/bin/etcdctl /usr/local/bin/ COPY --from=etcd /usr/local/bin/etcdutl /usr/local/bin/ COPY --from=etcd /etc/nsswitch.conf /etc/nsswitch.conf CMD ["/usr/local/bin/etcd"]

Service registry and discovery etcd, consul, nacos

I ended up using the NGINX Proxy Manager [the projects home site] and added certificates but I'm seeing a fair number of installs going with https://traefik.io on YouTube.

Glad it was helpful! I had never heard of it before either, but it looks like it's been around since 2015. I've leaned on Traefik a lot in the past, but Fabio seemed to be a lot simpler. Simplicity was the rule of thumb for this exercise, So I didn't dig too hard for performance comparisons...

If this is a feature request for headersregexp, then you should place it in Traefik GitHub.

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/9879 ACME DNS provider broken since v2.9.9

I'm one of the many who hadn't heard of Traefic until MRSK mentioned it. The marketing seems very (overly?) targetted at cloud microservices and container-specific tech[1]. Is that just marketing, or is it really not a good fit for monoliths on bare-metal?

[1] https://github.com/traefik/traefik

You have now finally deployed an enterprise-grade Kubernetes cluster with k3s. You can now deploy some work on this cluster. Some components to take note of are for ingress, you already have Traefik installed, longhorn will handle storage and Containerd as the container runtime engine.

Traefik reverse proxy - https://github.com/traefik/traefik

Moved from https://nginxproxymanager.com/ to https://github.com/traefik/traefik

We use Traefik for Configuration Discovery in Docker Swarm (add a label with the sub-domain to the service and it will automatically be routed to), for simple setup I always found nginx-proxy to be easy to use with containers.

We use the Traefik load-balancer to expose our services, which we access as subdomains of localhost. In order ensure that we can access our Traefik-exposed services (and also the Traefik dashboard itself, you’ll need to add the following entries to /etc/hosts on your host machine: