etcd VS go-micro

Reading the standard library will give you ideas/insight about various Go idiomatic patterns/approaches, and you can see a full website/API implementation in the pkg.go.dev repository (https://github.com/golang/pkgsite). Projects like https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd may be interesting too.

Failure Detection and Recovery It’s not enough to have backup systems. It’s also crucial to detect failures quickly. Modern systems employ monitoring tools and rely on distributed coordination systems such as Zookeeper or etcd to identify faults in real-time: once detected, recovery mechanisms are triggered to restore the service.

Service Discovery: Microservices need to discover and communicate with each other dynamically. Service discovery tools like etcd, Consul, or Kubernetes built-in service discovery mechanisms help locate and connect to microservices running on different nodes within the infrastructure.

APISIX uses etcd to store and synchronize configurations.

etcd is an excellent key-value distributed database used internally by Kubernetes and managed by the CNCF. It's a great option, and that's the reason why Apache APISIX uses it too. Yet, it's not devoid of issues.

In traditional mode, APISIX stores its configuration in etcd. APISIX offers a rich API to access and update the configuration, the Admin API. In standalone mode, the configuration is just plain YAML. It's the approach for GitOps practitioners: you'd store your configuration in a Git repo, watch it via your favorite tool (e.g., Argo CD or Tekton), and the latter would propagate the changes to APISIX nodes upon changes. APISIX reloads its configuration every second or so.

I am not sure neither. But this might overcome the etcd's soft storage limit of 8GB? [1]

[1] https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/issues/9771

Apache APISIX is an API Gateway. By default, it stores its configuration in etcd, a distributed key-value store - the same one used by Kubernetes. Note that in real-world scenarios, we should set up etcd clustering to improve the resiliency of the solution. For this post, we will limit ourselves to a single etcd instance. Apache APISIX offers an admin API via HTTP endpoints. Finally, the gateway forwards calls from the client to an upstream. Here's an overview of the architecture and the required certificates:

While exploring popular projects such as etcd and especially traefik, I noticed a violation of the principle that states "interfaces should belong to the package that uses values of the interface type, not the package that implements those values." For example, Here we can see that ManagerFactory import Registry interface that placed here and implementations of this interface in the same package, which violates the aforementioned principle. Even if the interface is simply a specification, it should still be defined on the consumer side. Is it considered bad practice to follow what traefik does in this case or I doesn't understand somthing? P.S. I'm newcomer, so sorry if it's silly question.

Had similar goals. Started by writing Go interfaces for it with Go Micro - https://go-micro.dev then opted for the platform service model as you mentioned with Micro - https://micro.dev

I think whether it's Dapr, Micro or something else, the platform service model with well defined interfaces is the way to go. I don't think a lot of people get this yet so it's still going to be a few years before it takes off.

This is my library, unfortunately the website is filled with horrible popup ads.

See https://github.com/go-micro/go-micro instead.

I spent quite a few years working on a standalone framework called Go Micro which has now been donated to a community - https://github.com/go-micro/go-micro. Ultimately it never really achieved the potential I standardisation I was hoping for e.g something like gRPC.

Micro is more of an all encompassing platform that addresses not just writing code but running, consuming it, securing it. I've been using it in production for 3-4 years now after a lot of pure OSS development. Still as others are saying it may never reach its true potential without the backing of a big vendor.

Website: https://github.com/go-micro/go-micro

Good luck Buf! I spent many years building an RPC framework around gRPC called Go Micro (https://github.com/asim/go-micro). I think one of the biggest issues was just resources to see it through but also my own desire to move beyond it towards a platform and services. I hope you're able to bring some sense to the gRPC world. It's mostly a networking library. The ecosystem around it is too low level. If anything abstractions and more developer friendly tooling would be a massive improvement. No one needs to see or touch the guts of gRPC. I wish I didn't have to peak into the internals but unfortunately that's what it takes to integrate it elsewhere.

I hope you build something awesome for the community!

$ github-compare zeromicro/go-zero go-kratos/kratos asim/go-micro go-kit/kit ┌─────────────────────────┬─────────────────────┬───────────────────────┬──────────────────────┬──────────────────┐ │ METRICS │ ZEROMICRO/GO-ZERO │ GO-KRATOS/KRATOS │ ASIM/GO-MICRO │ GO-KIT/KIT │ ├─────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┼───────────────────────┼──────────────────────┼──────────────────┤ │ 🏠 homepage │ https://go-zero.dev │ https://go-kratos.dev │ https://go-micro.dev │ https://gokit.io │ │ 🌎 language │ Go │ Go │ Go │ Go │ │ 📌 license │ MIT License │ MIT License │ Apache License 2.0 │ MIT License │ │ ⏰ age │ 655 days │ 1231 days │ 2688 days │ 2668 days │ │ 🌟 stars │ 17778(27/d) │ 17856(14/d) │ 18233(6/d) │ 23084(8/d) │ │ 📊 latestDayStarCount │ 33 (up) │ 7 (down) │ 2 (down) │ 10 (up) │ │ 📉 latestWeekStarCount │ 227 (up) │ 64 (down) │ 31 (down) │ 44 (down) │ │ 📈 latestMonthStarCount │ 916 │ 531 │ 176 │ 235 │ │ 👏 forks │ 2520(3/d) │ 3446(2/d) │ 2087(0/d) │ 2315(0/d) │ │ 👀 watchers │ 266 │ 424 │ 510 │ 690 │ │ 💪 issues │ 50/741 │ 51/793 │ 76/914 │ 35/548 │ │ 💯 pull requests │ 13/1155 │ 10/1221 │ 0/1513 │ 9/627 │ │ 👥 contributors │ 132 │ 198 │ 166 │ 221 │ │ 🚀 releases │ 63 │ 49 │ 206 │ 12 │ │ 🔭 release circle(avg) │ 10 days │ 25 days │ 13 days │ 222 days │ │ 🎯 lastRelease │ 24 day(s) ago │ 1 day(s) ago │ 5 day(s) ago │ 8 month(s) ago │ │ 🕦 lastCommit │ 2 day(s) ago │ 2 hour(s) ago │ 5 day(s) ago │ 6 day(s) ago │ │ 📝 lastUpdate │ 47 minute(s) ago │ 16 minute(s) ago │ 1 hour(s) ago │ 1 hour(s) ago │ └─────────────────────────┴─────────────────────┴───────────────────────┴──────────────────────┴──────────────────┘