eruda VS wttr.in

Could you inject it as a bookmarklet?

If not, you could probably just paste it into Eruda (https://eruda.liriliri.io/)

More details about that on their github page [1]. It seems you basically need to include a JS file from [their CDN](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/eruda).

As someone who fondly remembers the early Firebug days, it is great to see this. It is very frustrating to me that tablets and phones are so powerful, but we can't do even basic dev stuff on them.

[1] https://github.com/liriliri/eruda

If you're taking about the browser's javascript console, I've got a userscript with eruda over here. You can use it with tampermonkey or violentmonkey or so on in Firefox (stable Firefox mobile finally added tampermonkey to their approved list of Android extensions).

I actually do allow Inspect on mobile if you right click the desktop (hold on mobile), using a library called Eruda (https://eruda.liriliri.io/). As for how I run flash, that is another library called Ruffle (https://ruffle.rs/).

wttr.in is unfortunately not accurate in many cities in the world, check their github issues

The difference with weafetch is that it has its own config file which can just be configured and not touched anymore. When using wttr.in with curl, any custom changes you want to get from the output will need to be typed in everytime.

What about https://wttr.in/ ?

The source of the data that are presented: https://github.com/chubin/wttr.in

I don't recommend using wttr.io at all, their current provider shows inaccurate information for many cities, including Berlin. (source)

Oups the last link was incorrect it should have been https://github.com/chubin/wttr.in. I pull the info and store it in a txt file then I reference with cat or sed. That way it's super quick.

See https://github.com/chubin/wttr.in