purescript VS purescript

Some of the problems have been already fixed due to our reports, but some of them haven’t been accepted as they involved some overhead on the performance in the general case. Because of this we have forked the compiler and started adjusting it for our needs ourselves. Our works mainly involve the optimization tweaks and updating the backend to EcmaScript6 (instead of 5). For instance, we have implemented a much more aggressive tail call optimizer, increased strictness of AST traversals and completely rewritten the code generation for pattern match alternatives.

Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.

Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.

PureScript[1][2] seems pretty alive these days. From my relatively small, self-contained experiments, it's a lot more flexible and expressive than Elm at the expense of (maybe?) being a bit harder to learn up-front.

[1]: https://www.purescript.org/

[2]:https://github.com/purescript/purescript

*cough* I mean Purescript.

Assuming this is a PS knock, fwiw this went away a good bit ago: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/releases/tag/v0.14.2