Enzyme
WebdriverIO
Our great sponsors
Enzyme | WebdriverIO | |
---|---|---|
32 | 37 | |
19,979 | 8,743 | |
-0.0% | 0.7% | |
6.7 | 9.9 | |
about 2 months ago | 6 days ago | |
JavaScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Enzyme
-
Testing React Components: A Comprehensive Overview of Testing Libraries
Enzyme is another popular testing utility for React. It allows you to manipulate and traverse React components' output, making it easier to write comprehensive tests.
-
Speeding up the JavaScript ecosystem – Polyfills gone rogue
ljharb is an extremely interesting person. There’s no doubting the positive impact he’s had on the OSS community and the work he’s done.
However, there are some things he does that are incomprehensible.
For example, Enzyme. Over three years ago this issue was opened for Enzyme on React 17: https://github.com/enzymejs/enzyme/issues/2429
Nothing moved for a while, and I think he said something along the lines of “if you want React 17 support, stop complaining and help”. So the community got involved. There are multiple PRs adding React 17 support. Many unofficial React 17 adapters. A lot of people have put a lot of work into this, ensuring compatibility, coverage etc. Yet to this day, none of them have been merged. Eg https://github.com/enzymejs/enzyme/pull/2564
Given the amount of time that has passed, and the work the community has put in, something is amiss. It feels like he’s now intentionally avoiding React 17+ support. But why? I don’t understand why someone would ask for help then ignore the help when it comes in. That isn’t much better than the swathe of rude/entitled comments he was getting on the issue before he locked it.
I ended up migrating to RTL, but this made many of my tests more complicated (especially compared to shallow rendering).
-
Mastering React Testing: A Comprehensive Guide to Jest, Enzyme, and React Testing Library
Enzyme Documentation
-
How To Scale Your React Applications
One way to do this is by writing tests for your React components. Tools like Jest and Enzyme make it easy to test your component's behavior, rendering output, and state changes. By writing tests for your components, you can ensure that they behave as expected and prevent issues before they reach production.
-
Top OpenAI Tools, Examples & Use Cases
GitHub link: https://github.com/enzymejs/enzyme
-
How to Confidently Write Unit Tests using React Testing Library
So If you have experience with enzyme testing, where you might be checking the value of state once you click any button or you might be checking the prop value If something changes.
-
Difference Between JEST and Enzyme?
Enzyme offers two types of API for shallow rendering and full rendering. Both are preferred for different test scenarios and functionalities.
-
Testing with Jest and React Testing Library
At Visa, I was writing unit tests for a Next.js project using components designed with Chakra UI. That's where React Testing Library came in handy. Unlike other solutions like Enzyme, I did not have to worry about the application snapshot but could instead focus on each UI element, its expected behaviour and the data it would render upon user interactions.
-
Superset: Testing and Enzyme to RTL conversion
Superset uses Jest and React Testing Library (RTL) to write unit and integration tests. In the past we used Enzyme, but now that we're currently converting all of our class components to functional components, Enzyme cannot support our testing needs. Since RTL is better for testing functional components, we're converting all of our test files to RTL. This can be quite a learning curve - I've gone through a lot of the process so I'd like to share what I've learned so far.
-
What would you consider to be a must for a modern 2022 dev stack?
react testing library instead of enzyme for testing react UIs. I'll never go back.
WebdriverIO
-
Learn Automated Testing At Home: A Beginner's Guide
3.WebdriverIO: WebdriverIO is another popular open-source test automation framework. Key Features: Integrates well with popular testing frameworks (e.g., Mocha, Jasmine). Supports both synchronous and asynchronous commands. Works with various browsers and platforms
-
Way to High Confidence: The Ideal Testing Trophy
Webdriver.io
-
Battle-Testing Nx Console with E2E Tests
WebdriverIO (abbreviated as WDIO) is an E2E testing framework for Node.js. It allows you to automate all kinds of web and mobile applications using the Webdriver or Chrome DevTools protocols.
-
Projects Coming to Life 🌈 Inside of VS Code - Marquee's Project Mode
Curate your repo’s dashboard for your team’s benefit by checking in relevant VS Code settings into your version control system. Install Marquee and give it a shot.
-
Wizard level tips for testing/QA JS browser code ? How do you ensure full coverage, generate test cases, etc ?
My team uses Vue.js. We use Karma/Mocha/Chai and Sinon and Vue Test Utils to test our Vue components. For E2E testing we use Webdriver.io, but have in the past used Selenium written in Kotlin, and also Cypress.
-
Breaking changes between 14 and 16?
There were changes to node-fibers that broke at least one thing I used, the sync mode of WebdriverIO. https://github.com/webdriverio/webdriverio/discussions/6702
-
WebdriverIO supports Chaining without multiple await statements
Ever since WebdriverIO got launched, major companies adopted this tool for automation. It became popular very fast due to its powerful advantages. Since the launch, there have been lots of changes and improvements being made to the tool. In this article, we'll be discussing one of the improvements that have really helped us in writing automation scripts in async mode.
WebdriverIO is asynchronous by nature. Earlier, WebdriverIO used to provide the ability to run commands in sync mode using node-fibers. However, due to some breaking changes in Chromium, WebdriverIO discontinued the support for sync mode. Please refer Sync vs. Async Mode and this issue for more information.
-
Advanced Roadmap for React.js developers
-Selenium -Webdriver -Cypress -Puppeteer -Cucumber.js -Nightwatch.js
-
The React roadmap for beginners you never knew you needed.
Selenium, Webdriver
What are some alternatives?
Playwright - Playwright is a framework for Web Testing and Automation. It allows testing Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API.
jest - Delightful JavaScript Testing.
TestCafe - A Node.js tool to automate end-to-end web testing.
nightwatch - Integrated end-to-end testing framework written in Node.js and using W3C Webdriver API. Developed at @browserstack
Protractor - E2E test framework for Angular apps
CodeceptJS - Supercharged End 2 End Testing Framework for NodeJS
Cypress - Fast, easy and reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser.
react-testing-library - 🐐 Simple and complete React DOM testing utilities that encourage good testing practices.
istanbul - Yet another JS code coverage tool that computes statement, line, function and branch coverage with module loader hooks to transparently add coverage when running tests. Supports all JS coverage use cases including unit tests, server side functional tests and browser tests. Built for scale.
lighthouse-ci - Automate running Lighthouse for every commit, viewing the changes, and preventing regressions
electron-spectron-example - A example of using Spectron to test an Electron application
puppeteer - Node.js API for Chrome