emacs-libvterm VS multi-vterm

> 3. Terminals

Since you use Emacs, why not use Eat or vterm?

https://codeberg.org/akib/emacs-eat

https://github.com/akermu/emacs-libvterm

> 4. File Manager (gui)

Why not Dired?

From my jolly Julia days I’m used to julia-vterm. This emacs package runs a Julia REPL using a full terminal emulator (emacs-libvterm). So in the pursuit of a nice hack, I M-x replace-string’d the word juliawith python and gave it a shot. Remarkably, the whole thing just worked without much tweaking and you can enjoy the result by checking out the GitHub repo.

Also, look into vterm_prompt_end to get this updated vterm-buffer-local anytime your prompt emits the cwd. https://github.com/akermu/emacs-libvterm

Emacs or term? If the latter, I'd recommend using vterm if it is a possibility for you - https://github.com/akermu/emacs-libvterm

They are actually working on even better Emacs integration. Granted, vterm is an external library, so there will always be a layer between the editor and the terminal.

I've followed the steps shown in the README: sh vterm_printf() { if [ -n "$TMUX" ] && ([ "${TERM%%-*}" = "tmux" ] || [ "${TERM%%-*}" = "screen" ]); then # Tell tmux to pass the escape sequences through printf "\ePtmux;\e\e]%s\007\e\\" "$1" elif [ "${TERM%%-*}" = "screen" ]; then # GNU screen (screen, screen-256color, screen-256color-bce) printf "\eP\e]%s\007\e\\" "$1" else printf "\e]%s\e\\" "$1" fi } vterm_prompt_end() { vterm_printf "51;A$(whoami)@$(hostname):$(pwd)" } setopt PROMPT_SUBST PROMPT=$PROMPT'%{$(vterm_prompt_end)%}' but it is simply not working.

[1]https://github.com/ohmyzsh/ohmyzsh/tree/master/plugins/fzf [2]https://github.com/romkatv/powerlevel10k [3]https://starship.rs/ [4]https://github.com/tmux/tmux [5]https://github.com/ahendriksen/ob-tmux [6]https://github.com/akermu/emacs-libvterm [7]https://github.com/tmux-plugins/tpm

Have checked out https://github.com/akermu/emacs-libvterm? It has everything you need to know. Since you are a developer I expect it will be easy for you. Thanks for sharing your experience:)

multi-vterm allows you to quickly jump to the next or previous numbered vterm.. Maybe that's already enough for you..

Yes, just checked and you are right, it works. I was so sure it doesn't support that since multi-vterm exists.

Furthermore, there are also workaround solutions to this, e. g. in the multi-vterm package. See the sample configuration at the end of the repo's README.md.