efrisby VS proper

Compare efrisby vs proper and see what are their differences.

efrisby

A REST API testing framework for erlang (by FabioBatSilva)
Testing
Source Code
hex.pm
Suggest alternative
Edit details

proper

PropEr: a QuickCheck-inspired property-based testing tool for Erlang (by proper-testing)
Testing Erlang release-badge codecov-badge erlang-versions-badge
Source Code
proper-testing.github.io
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
efrisby proper
- 3
18 878
- 0.1%
0.0 3.1
about 7 years ago 9 months ago
Erlang Erlang
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

efrisby

Posts with mentions or reviews of efrisby. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning efrisby yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

proper

Posts with mentions or reviews of proper. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-03.
  • How programmers make sure that their software is correct
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Jan 2022
    > There are generally two main categories of tests. There are unit tests [and] Integration tests

    Later on there is a mention of fuzzing. However, there is something better called property tests. Where the on failure there is automatic "shrinking" of input complexity to find a minimally failing test scenario.

    For Erlang and Elixir I recommend https://propertesting.com/ book and the PropEr test framework https://github.com/proper-testing/proper.

    As an example, here is the use of an advanced feature called targeted property based testing: https://proper-testing.github.io/tutorials/PropEr_testing_wi... used to test a labyrinth.

  • Laura Castro on Property-Based Testing in Elixir
    5 projects | dev.to | 3 Sep 2021
    [1] https://proper-testing.github.io/

What are some alternatives?

When comparing efrisby and proper you can also consider the following projects:

mix_test_watch - 🎠 Because TDD is awesome

StreamData - Data generation and property-based testing for Elixir. 🔮

hypermock - HTTP request stubbing and expectation Elixir library

espec - Elixir Behaviour Driven Development

mix_erlang_tasks - Common tasks for Erlang projects that use Mix

meck - A mocking library for Erlang

pavlov - A BDD framework for your Elixir projects

Quixir - Property-based testing for Elixir

hound - Elixir library for writing integration tests and browser automation

espec_phoenix - ESpec for Phoenix web framework.

ElixirMock - Creates clean, concurrent, inspectable mocks from elixir modules

efrisby vs mix_test_watch proper vs StreamData efrisby vs hypermock proper vs espec efrisby vs mix_erlang_tasks proper vs meck efrisby vs pavlov proper vs Quixir efrisby vs hound proper vs espec_phoenix efrisby vs ElixirMock proper vs hound