duckdb VS sqltorrent

I'm not sure if the fix is reassuring or not: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/pull/9411/files

It's an interesting question!

The problem is that the data is spread everywhere - no choice about that. So with that in mind, how do you query that data? Today, the idea is that you HAVE to put it into a central location. With tools like Bacalhau[1] and DuckDB [2], you no longer have to - a single query can be sharded amongst all your data - EFFECTIVELY giving you a lot of what you want from a data lake.

It's not a replacement, but if you can do a few of these items WITHOUT moving the data, you will be able to see really significant cost and time savings.

[1] https://github.com/bacalhau-project/bacalhau

[2] https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb

[4] Switch to Push-Based Execution Model by Mytherin · Pull Request #2393 · duckdb/duckdb (github.com)

it depends on your query obviously.

In general, I did very deep benchmarking of pg, clickhouse and duckdb, and I sure didn't make stupid mistakes like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36990831

My dataset has 50B rows and 2tb of data, and I think columnar dbs are very overhiped and I chose pg because:

- pg performance is acceptable, maybe 2-3x times slower than clickhouse and duckdb on some queries if pg is configured correctly and run on compressed storage

- clickhouse and duckdb start falling apart very fast because they specialized on very narrow type of queries: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/47520 https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/47521 https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/discussions/6696

This action installs duckdb with the version provided in input.

Duckdb: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb - seems pretty popular, been keeping an eye on this for close to a year now.

The Parquet-Go library is very complex, not yet success to use it. So I ask whether DuckDB can provide API https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/issues/7776

Or even better store data as an sqlite file that is full-text-search indexed. Then you can full-text search the torrent on demand: https://github.com/bittorrent/sqltorrent

"There was that project some guy posted a while back that used a combination of sqlite and partial downloads to enable searches on a database before it was downloaded all the way."

https://github.com/bittorrent/sqltorrent

Interesting question. I looked at the source code to understand that.

SQLite knows where to look for when you open a SQLite database and you run a query, right? It just asks the underlying filesystem to provide N bytes starting from an offset using a C function, then it repeats the same operation on different portions of the file, it does its computation and everybody is happy.

The software relies on sqltorrent, which is a custom VFS for SQLite. That means that SQLite function to read data from a file stored in the filesystem is replaced by a custom function. Such custom code computes which Torrent block(s) should have the highest priority, by dividing the offset and the number of bytes that SQLite wants to read by the size of the torrent blocks. It is just a division.

See: https://github.com/bittorrent/sqltorrent/blob/master/sqltorr...