Dubbo
gRPC
Our great sponsors
Dubbo | gRPC | |
---|---|---|
1 | 11 | |
39,929 | 11,104 | |
0.4% | 1.0% | |
9.8 | 9.6 | |
about 19 hours ago | 7 days ago | |
Java | Java | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Dubbo
gRPC
- FLaNK Stack Weekly 12 February 2024
-
Distroless Alpine
I've trialled my new image with an existing project via JLink that's heavy on Netty and gRPC the image works great (with a small tweak to exclude grpc-netty-shaded due to grpc-java#9083).
-
Buf raises $93M to deprecate REST/JSON
`proto_library` for building the `.bin` file from protos works great. Generating stubs/messages for "all" languages does not. Each language does not want to implement gRPC rules, the gRPC team does not want to implement rules for each language. Sort of a deadlock situation. For example:
- C++: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/bazel/cc_grpc_libra...
- Python: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/bazel/python_rules....
- ObjC: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/bazel/objc_grpc_lib...
- Java: https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/blob/master/java_grpc_libr...
- Go (different semantics than all of the other): https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_go/blob/master/proto/def...
But there's also no real cohesion within the community. The biggest effort to date has been in https://github.com/stackb/rules_proto which integrates with gazelle.
tl;dr: Low alignment results in diverging implementations that are complicated to understand for newcomers. Buff's approach is much more appealing as it's a "this is the one way to do the right thing" and having it just work by detecting `proto_library` and doing all of the linting/registry stuff automagically in CI would be fantastic.
-
grpc_bench: open-source, objective gRPC benchmark
Small clarification (to my understanding, I'm not a Java Guru) on why Java got on top - those Java implementations use something called Direct Executor. It's super performant when there's no chance of a blocking operation. But if you are to do anything more than echo service, you might be in trouble. Other implementations probably don't suffer from the same constraint. The related discussion can be found in this PR.
-
GRPC
If you do streaming then the best option would be to use a so called manual flow control. You can find an example here.
-
High performing APIs with gRPC
Another interesting link is their official grpc-java benchmarks project, which is also used in the benchmark I've posted you.
What are some alternatives?
Netty - Netty project - an event-driven asynchronous network application framework
Finagle - A fault tolerant, protocol-agnostic RPC system
OkHttp - Square’s meticulous HTTP client for the JVM, Android, and GraalVM.
Undertow - High performance non-blocking webserver
KryoNet - TCP/UDP client/server library for Java, based on Kryo
Async Http Client - Asynchronous Http and WebSocket Client library for Java
gatling-grpc - A Gatling load test plugin for gRPC
sshj - ssh, scp and sftp for java
MINA - Mirror of Apache MINA